Hello Jana-

Yes, JDK’s from those vendors should work. Please refer to my previous email 
for notes on JDK + ActiveMQ version alignment as well as testing.

Let us know what you end up using and how it goes!

Thanks,
-Matt

> On Feb 22, 2023, at 12:08 PM, Jana Manju <janamanj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your reply Matt, I am looking for input if I can use the
> following open source third party JDK as an alternative to Licensed Oracle
> Java
> for my activeMQ to work?
> 
> 
> 
> * Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK Adoptium Eclipse Temurin Azul Java*
> 
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 03:09, Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Jana-
>> 
>> As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the
>> recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing is to
>> use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially security.
>> 
>> JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few days, as
>> the release vote is underway)
>> 
>> That being said, it is recommended you test your workload against the
>> JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Matt Pavlovich
>> 
>>> On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <janamanj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Team,
>>> 
>>> We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker system for
>> one
>>> of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment) is must for
>>> ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following approved OpenJDK
>> by
>>> the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java for ActiveMQ
>>> to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc.
>>> 
>>>  Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK
>>>  Adoptium Eclipse Temurin
>>>  Azul Java
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to