Looking back through the email thread I don't see a clear indication of which version you're upgrading from. Can you clarify this for me?
Justin On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:51 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC <bruno.aburto....@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote: > Configuration file > > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configuration file? > > > Justin > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:59 AM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC < > bruno.aburto....@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote: > > > Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on > > OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ > > > > No. As the website [1] states: > > > > Java compatibility: 11+ > > > > The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6. > > > > > > Justin > > > > [1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/ > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC > > < bruno.aburto....@us.af.mil.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4? > > > > > > On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote: > > > > Hello Jana- > > > > > > > > As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to > > > > the > > > recent generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important > > > thing is to use latest releases to incorporate fixes— especially > security. > > > > > > > > JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few > > > > days, > > > as the release vote is underway) > > > > > > > > That being said, it is recommended you test your workload against > > > > the > > > JDK+ActiveMQ combination to confirm. > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Matt Pavlovich > > > > > > > > > On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Jana Manju <ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > > > We are in process of configuring ActiveMQ as message broker > > > > > system for > > > one > > > > > of our critical application, As JRE(Java Runtime Environment) is > > > > > must > > > for > > > > > ActiveMq to work, could you please confirm if following approved > > > OpenJDK by > > > > > the 3rd Party Software will give same ability as Oracle Java for > > > ActiveMQ > > > > > to work w.r.t its configuration and performance etc. > > > > > > > > > > Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK > > > > > Adoptium Eclipse Temurin > > > > > Azul Java > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
