Do you know what the approximate overhead is for using a transaction for
each message received?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there have been some fixes in this area (transaction aborting) for the 5.3,
> so may want to try 5.3-SNAPSHOT and see if it works for yo
Hi,
there have been some fixes in this area (transaction aborting) for the 5.3,
so may want to try 5.3-SNAPSHOT and see if it works for you
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.3-SNAPSHOT/
I've also documented it a bit (with a working example
Thanks very much for AMQ CPP. Our legacy system using the stomp library from
http://stomp.codehaus.org and write stomp frame to socket directly.
The impls of commit and abort are "COMMIT" and "ABORT" in the stomp frame
header.
With regards to "ABORT", the message acknowledge are abort and M
Yes - it looks like there was a bug fixed in the transaction support [1] so
you would need the 2.2 release [2] of the C++ API for the transacted session
capabilities.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-174
[2] http://activemq.apache.org/cms/activemq-cpp-22-release.html
Regards
/D
Thanks very much for the information. For the C/C++ sender and receiver,
does stomp provide the similar functionality as JMS session ?
Dave Stanley wrote:
>
> You can created a transacted jms session and either commit() or rollback()
> that session. See:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activ
You can created a transacted jms session and either commit() or rollback()
that session. See:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/JmsTransactionTestSupport.java?view=markup
Regards
/Dave
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:45 PM, jzhang1 wrote:
>
>
