Hi, there have been some fixes in this area (transaction aborting) for the 5.3, so may want to try 5.3-SNAPSHOT and see if it works for you
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.3-SNAPSHOT/ I've also documented it a bit (with a working example), so take a look at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/How+do+I+unack+the+message+with+Stomp Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:12 PM, jzhang1 <jian.zh...@etrade.com> wrote: > > Thanks very much for AMQ CPP. Our legacy system using the stomp library > from > http://stomp.codehaus.org and write stomp frame to socket directly. > > The impls of commit and abort are "COMMIT" and "ABORT" in the stomp frame > header. > > With regards to "ABORT", the message acknowledge are abort and MQ broker > still keep this message. > We expect on the next call of stomp_read, MQ broker deliver this pending > messages. However it does not unless reconnect and subscribe to the queue. > Is there any header attribute or configuration to let pending messages > redeliver on the next call stomp_read ? > > > > > > > Dave Stanley wrote: > > > > Yes - it looks like there was a bug fixed in the transaction support [1] > > so > > you would need the 2.2 release [2] of the C++ API for the transacted > > session > > capabilities. > > > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-174 > > [2] http://activemq.apache.org/cms/activemq-cpp-22-release.html > > > > Regards > > /Dave > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:07 PM, jzhang1 <jian.zh...@etrade.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> Thanks very much for the information. For the C/C++ sender and > receiver, > >> does stomp provide the similar functionality as JMS session ? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Dave Stanley wrote: > >> > > >> > You can created a transacted jms session and either commit() or > >> rollback() > >> > that session. See: > >> > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/JmsTransactionTestSupport.java?view=markup > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > /Dave > >> > > >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:45 PM, jzhang1 <jian.zh...@etrade.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> ActiveMQ guru, > >> >> > >> >> I am curious whether ActiveMQ broker provide backout > >> >> > >> >> all enqueue and dequeue functions calls that have occurred since the > >> last > >> >> syncpoint are to be backed out. Messages put as part of a unit of > work > >> >> are > >> >> deleted; messages retrieved as part of a unit of work are reinstated > >> on > >> >> the > >> >> queue. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> View this message in context: > >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Messages-rollback-tp21968419p21968419.html > >> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/Messages-rollback-tp21968419p21980374.html > >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Messages-rollback-tp21968419p22005863.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
