Yes - it looks like there was a bug fixed in the transaction support [1] so you would need the 2.2 release [2] of the C++ API for the transacted session capabilities.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-174 [2] http://activemq.apache.org/cms/activemq-cpp-22-release.html Regards /Dave On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:07 PM, jzhang1 <jian.zh...@etrade.com> wrote: > > Thanks very much for the information. For the C/C++ sender and receiver, > does stomp provide the similar functionality as JMS session ? > > > > > Dave Stanley wrote: > > > > You can created a transacted jms session and either commit() or > rollback() > > that session. See: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/JmsTransactionTestSupport.java?view=markup > > > > Regards > > /Dave > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:45 PM, jzhang1 <jian.zh...@etrade.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> ActiveMQ guru, > >> > >> I am curious whether ActiveMQ broker provide backout > >> > >> all enqueue and dequeue functions calls that have occurred since the > last > >> syncpoint are to be backed out. Messages put as part of a unit of work > >> are > >> deleted; messages retrieved as part of a unit of work are reinstated on > >> the > >> queue. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/Messages-rollback-tp21968419p21968419.html > >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Messages-rollback-tp21968419p21980374.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
