Jiri Daněk 于2019年8月1日周四 上午4:48写道：
> Where does the Artemis plugin/interceptor live at this moment? I looked
for
> it but did not find it. Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:22 PM yw yw wrote:
> Hi! Did you have checked against the latest code? It's
> ActiveMQServerPlugin,
> something like that:
Hi! Did you have checked against the latest code? It's ActiveMQServerPlugin,
something like that:
public interface ActiveMQServerPlugin extends
ActiveMQServerBasePlugin,
ActiveMQServerConnectionPlugin,
ActiveMQServerSessionPlugin,
ActiveMQServerConsumerPlugin,
ActiveMQServerAddressPlugin,
A
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:23 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) <
carsten.lohm...@bosch-si.com> wrote:
> >
> > This kind of distributed tracing seems almost like logging frameworks
> where
> > eventually a facade like slf4j was developed to support all the different
> > individual frameworks.
> >
> >
t; michael.andre.pea...@me.com.INVALID> Date: 20/08/2018 17:35 (GMT+00:00)
> To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] OpenTracing
> in Artemis
> Btw similar initiatives, which all could be requesting similar stating the
> same argument.
>
> https://opencensu
tivemq.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] OpenTracing in Artemis
Whilst appreciate that open tracing project intent is that it becomes the
standard, afaik there is just two main project adopting it zipkin and jaeger.
Currently none of the big APM vendors some i mentioned in previous are backin
so people can add
and maintain the support, without needing changes in the core broker.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message From: "michael.andre.pearce"
Date: 20/08/2018 16:37 (GMT+00:00) To:
users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW
Whilst appreciate that open tracing project intent is that it becomes the
standard, afaik there is just two main project adopting it zipkin and jaeger.
Currently none of the big APM vendors some i mentioned in previous are backing
it. As such they could form create their standard and then come wi
