On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:23 PM Lohmann Carsten (INST/ECS4) < carsten.lohm...@bosch-si.com> wrote:
> > > > This kind of distributed tracing seems almost like logging frameworks > where > > eventually a facade like slf4j was developed to support all the different > > individual frameworks. > > > > In any event, I definitely think it's best at this point simply for the > > broker to expose hooks (e.g. ActiveMQServerPlugin) rather than integrate > a > > particular solution (as Michael has already suggested). > > ok, makes sense. I can understand the points made previously about not > wanting to integrate it in the broker at this point. > > > I also think the code should be hosted in a separate repository so it can > > have its own release cycle, etc. The broker documentation could > certainly > > have a chapter on distributed tracing which links to the other repo, > though. > > Good. So, it'll be a solution based on a broker plugin/interceptors. And > opentracing-contrib looks like the preferred place to put it. > Where does the Artemis plugin/interceptor live at this moment? I looked for it but did not find it. Thanks. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Jiri Daněk
