Re: ActiveMQ web-console fails to start: Could not open ServletContext resource

Found the fix. Noticed that we have already opened bug tickets in ActiveMQ concerning this. *ISSUE:* It's not directly related to ActiveMQ, it's due to an upgrade of Jetty which has some fixes that restrict the symbolic reference usage. ( /opt/app-1 -> /opt/app) *FIX:* Referring to actual refe

Re: ActiveMQ web console on Edge browser

Hi Sundar, Thanks for sharing. To be honest, I didn't try on Edge (only Chrome and Safari). Let me check if I have a Windows VM with Edge. Regards JB On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:14 AM Pattamadai, Sundar wrote: > > Hello, > We are running activemq version 5.17.1. When trying to access the web con

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console - Prevent display of sensitive content?

on: java.io.StreamCorruptedException: invalid stream header: 0001" > > But at the client I can still take the bytes and do what I need to. Yet > to fully vet this out. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tim Bain > Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 7:3

RE: ActiveMQ Web Console - Prevent display of sensitive content?

bytes. Reason: java.io.StreamCorruptedException: invalid stream header: 0001" But at the client I can still take the bytes and do what I need to. Yet to fully vet this out. -Original Message- From: Tim Bain Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 7:38 AM To: ActiveMQ Users Subjec

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console - Prevent display of sensitive content?

If you want to prevent messages from being read by people other than the intended recipient, whether on the web console or elsewhere, the standard way to do that is to encrypt the message when sending and then have the intended recipient decrypt it upon receipt. Or you can limit access to the web

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console Concurrent User Limit

Thank you for that link about concurrent connections. It might be a way to satisfy the security requirement so I will look into it. Daniel On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 5:54 AM Tim Bain wrote: > Some of the answers at the bottom of the list of answers for > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5737

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console Concurrent User Limit

Some of the answers at the bottom of the list of answers for https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5737923/how-do-i-limit-the-number-of-connections-jetty-will-accept provide ways to limit the number of concurrent *connections*, but I didn't see anything to limit the number of sessions. Tim On Wed,

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

Thank you so much. It makes sense. This is what I was looking for :) -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

I think there may be a bit of confusion about the presentation of the information between the two consoles. The ActiveMQ 5.x console presents information mainly in JMS terms (e.g. queues, topics, durable subscribers, non-durable subscribers, etc.). However, Artemis was written from the ground up to

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

What Clebert is saying is something along the lines of "If you have concrete, specific improvements you'd like to see for the web console, please submit them as JIRA enhancement requests, preferably with an associated pull request that fixes them." Also, keep in mind that UX preferences can be (no

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

I meant something like this -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

I thought artemis is pretty good. We accept pull requests thought ;) On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:15 PM artemisn00b wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering why activemq's web console is much better, compared to > artemis. Is there a reason to it? > In ActiveMQ, you can view all the Active Durable Topic

Re: Activemq web console is not getting up.

What indicates that the exception you quoted is related to the web console? Nothing about that stack trace jumps out at me as being related. On May 3, 2017 10:48 PM, "srinivas.indali" wrote: > Hi All, > > We are upgrading Activemq 5.9 to 5.14.4, messages are getting processed but > web console i

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console

If a topic has no consumers, a message is enqueued but can be discarded immediately because it has been dispatched to all consumers (zero, in this case). In that case, the messages use no resources, and they would not explain a full message store. However, if you have subscriptions (either from a

Re: ActiveMQ web console

Hi Christopher, Nothing really new here. We are using this console for our own purpose on more than 80 servers and are quite happy with the stability of it. Do you think that it could be possible to list it as a third party monitoring console on the ActiveMQ webpage (http://activemq.apache.org/how

Re: activemq web console does not show queue messages

That sounds likely to be client-side buffering. I've never used a QPID client, but with the ActiveMQ native libraries connecting to an ActiveMQ 5 broker, the messages always show up immediately on the broker, and the descriptions I've read of how the ActiveMQ broker handles non-OpenWire messages m

Re: ActiveMQ web console

There was some talk in another thread on the dev list about a possible donation of AMQC. I had mentioned this in that same thread but if the project does get donated I would think making it into a separate ActiveMQ sub project would be best. Then it could support both ActiveMQ 5.x and eventually

Re: ActiveMQ web console

If it works better than the current web console, I'd be in favor of deploying both and recommending the new one (and maybe eventually deploying only this new console, if it really does turn out to be a full replacement), once it's had a long enough shake-out period to fix any bugs and gain confiden

Re: ActiveMQ web console

Interesting point. Jetty is a technology used by the current webconsole, so yes disabling the same disables the webconsole. That leads to the question, "is there any issue with changing that dependency to jolokia?" Anyway, are we even talking about replacing the existing webconsole, or did I rea

Re: ActiveMQ web console

I wonder what will take to make it compatible with Artemis. it would be cool as well. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Tim Bain wrote: > The web console doesn't work with Jetty disabled, and this doesn't work > with Jolokia disabled. Is the difference between those two statements > really as big

Re: ActiveMQ web console

The web console doesn't work with Jetty disabled, and this doesn't work with Jolokia disabled. Is the difference between those two statements really as big as you've made it out to be? The simple fact of having some well-documented dependencies doesn't seem like a deal-breaker to me... Tim On De

Re: ActiveMQ web console

I like the look-and-feel of this console, based on the screen-shots at https://github.com/snuids/AMQC/wiki. It's very interesting that this tool works entirely out of the browser as well. All of the information displayed is obtained via jolokia, is that correct? And all administration also opera

Re: ActiveMQ web console

ActiveMQ 5.13.0 has been upgraded to the latest Jetty 9.2.x version. It has been released and will be formally announced as soon as the binaries are mirrored everywhere (by tomorrow). On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:31 AM, A.Marchand wrote: > In fact, the password never reaches the demo host server,

RE: ActiveMQ web console

Hi Devlin, Our console app simply retrieves most of what is accessible via the jolokia api. So if the info is not displayed in one tab of our interface it is probably not there. If it is included, displaying these particular information on a specific page is quite easy if you simply use the same s

Re: ActiveMQ web console

In fact, the password never reaches the demo host server, because the angular demo application that you get from the host site runs in your browser. If you check the network flow from your browser, you will see that nothing is posted to the host. The angular app simply makes Rest Call to your local

Re: ActiveMQ web console

There was some discussion about donating stomp.js to ActiveMQ here: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Code-donation-for-stomp-js-td4694260.html I don't think anything ever came of it though. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote: > This is really nice! > > My biggest compla

RE: ActiveMQ web console

This is really nice! My biggest complaint with web consoles for ActiveMQ and RedHats' A-MQ is the lack of unified view for critical metrics across a cluster of brokers. Things like process cpu load, store/temp usage, # of connections, producers, consumers, and enqueue/dequeue count are essentia

Re: ActiveMQ web console

Nice, thanks for creating this, and for open-sourcing it. Hopefully anyone using the demo app will use it to access a dummy broker that's been configured with a throw-away password that gets changed immediately after using the demo app. Providing usernames and passwords to third parties is never

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console clashes with existing broker

On 20 January 2014 11:10, Hilderich wrote: > Hello All, > > Thank you for your efforts. > > Unfortunately after starting hawt.io there was no ActiveMQ menu entry > available. It sounds like you've never actually connected to the Apache ActiveMQ broker process yet. FWIW 5.9.0 of ActiveMQ comes w

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console clashes with existing broker

Hello All, Thank you for your efforts. Unfortunately after starting hawt.io there was no ActiveMQ menu entry available. Furthermore port 8080 was in use by another process on my pc so I decided to use port 8011. java -jar hawtio-app-1.2.2.jar --port 8090 I have read a running ActiveMQ Broker sh

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console clashes with existing broker

e.g. here's viewing queue sizes https://raw.github.com/hawtio/hawtio/master/website/src/images/screenshots/jmx.png here's browsing the message details on a queue https://raw.github.com/hawtio/hawtio/master/website/src/images/screenshots/activemqBrowse.png On 20 January 2014 10:47, Claus Ibsen

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console clashes with existing broker

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Hilderich wrote: > Hello Claus, > > Thank you a lot for answering. > > As far as I have evaluate hawt.io there is no feature like: > > List all messages in a concrete JMS Queue and provide > the feature to delete one if necessary. ActiveMQ Web Console > give you t

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console clashes with existing broker

On 20 January 2014 10:42, Hilderich wrote: > Hello Claus, > > Thank you a lot for answering. > > As far as I have evaluate hawt.io there is no feature like: > > List all messages in a concrete JMS Queue and provide > the feature to delete one if necessary. ActiveMQ Web Console > give you this cha

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console clashes with existing broker

Hello Claus, Thank you a lot for answering. As far as I have evaluate hawt.io there is no feature like: List all messages in a concrete JMS Queue and provide the feature to delete one if necessary. ActiveMQ Web Console give you this chance. hawt.io provides just the raw jmx mechanisms not prope

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console clashes with existing broker

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Hilderich wrote: > Hello dear Supporters, > > We have already an existing ActiveMQ Broker in a OSGi container (Karaf). > Now I'd like to utilize the ActiveMQ Web Console to have an overview about > the JMS Queues we are using. > The problem is that the ActiveMQ Web

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console - retry button

Jira issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4174 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Web-Console-retry-button-tp4659014p4659320.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archi

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console - retry button

I'd recommend opening a Jira issue and attaching a patch file for the latest code in trunk so someone can review it and decide if it should go into the code-base. Perhaps add some screenshots etc. On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 08:03 -0800, Tobb wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that the retry-button was adde

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console - retry button

Hi, It seems that the retry-button was added by the people that set up ActiveMQ last time. It can be achieved by tweaking the jsp's in \webapps\admin. I've gone through with some tweaks to get the retry button back. I'll post my tweaks here, they are really quite neat if you have set up to use on

Re: ActiveMQ Web Console - retry button

Hi Tobb, I have never noticed that button and don't think it can be re-enabled by some configuration. Regards, Torsten Mielke tors...@fusesource.com tmielke.blogspot.com On Nov 8, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Tobb wrote: > Hi, > > I recently upgraded ActiveMQ from version 5.3.0 to version 5.6.0. In

Re: activeMQ web console is throwing error when slave turns on

Thanks for the response. No, after the master died, I connect to the web console of the slave, which is in a different port. My master and slave use built-in jetty server. master: localhost:8161/admin/queues.jsp slave: localhost:8162/admin/queues.jsp -- View this message in context: http://ac

Re: activemq-web-console for tomcat

Thank you very much. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/activemq-web-console-for-tomcat-tp16137635s2354p16245128.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: activemq-web-console for tomcat

Hi, I've created a web-console on tomcat quick start guide http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Web+Console#WebConsole-ExampleconfigurationusingTomcat Please try following those steps and if it still doesn't work, post error messages you're getting Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac www.sc