I think there may be a bit of confusion about the presentation of the information between the two consoles. The ActiveMQ 5.x console presents information mainly in JMS terms (e.g. queues, topics, durable subscribers, non-durable subscribers, etc.). However, Artemis was written from the ground up to be a multi-protocol broker so it has a fundamental (i.e. "core") addressing model that all the supported protocols map onto. Therefore, the Artemis console presents information in terms of this "core" addressing model. Not every protocol has the concept of durable subscribers so it doesn't make a lot of sense to display information for those protocols in those terms, and it also doesn't make sense to present information for each protocol in a protocol specific fashion as that would basically require a different admin console for each protocol which would be a maintenance nightmare.
In your particular case, JMS durable subscriptions are implemented as multicast queues on an address where the name of the address is the same as the JMS topic and the name of the queue is the JMS client ID concatenated with the subscription name using a "." character. So, for example, if you created a durable subscription on topic "foo" with a client ID of "myClientID" and a subscription name of "myDurableSub" then the address would be named "foo" and the queue would be named "myClientID.myDurableSub". Non durable subscriptions are similar except that the name of the queue will be a UUID. Therefore you could see what durable and non-durable subscriptions existed on a particular topic by looking at what queues exist. You can tell if the durable subscriber is active by looking at the consumer count of the queue corresponding to the durable subscription. If the consumer count is greater than 0 then the subscriber is active. If the consumer count is 0 then the subscriber is inactive. Non-durable subscribers are always active by definition since their queues (i.e. their subscriptions) are deleted once they are inactive. Justin On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:15 PM artemisn00b <prahlad.mi...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering why activemq's web console is much better, compared to > artemis. Is there a reason to it? > In ActiveMQ, you can view all the Active Durable Topic Subscribers, Offline > Durable Topic Subscribers, Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers, > Topics/Queues on separate tabs. I know all of it can be done in Artemis as > well, but it just seems to be much better in terms of UI/X in ActiveMQ. > > Thanks. > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html >
