I wonder what will take to make it compatible with Artemis. it would be cool as well.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > The web console doesn't work with Jetty disabled, and this doesn't work > with Jolokia disabled. Is the difference between those two statements > really as big as you've made it out to be? > > The simple fact of having some well-documented dependencies doesn't seem > like a deal-breaker to me... > > Tim > On Dec 4, 2015 1:52 PM, "artnaseef" <a...@artnaseef.com> wrote: > >> I like the look-and-feel of this console, based on the screen-shots at >> https://github.com/snuids/AMQC/wiki. >> >> It's very interesting that this tool works entirely out of the browser as >> well. >> >> All of the information displayed is obtained via jolokia, is that correct? >> And all administration also operates via jolokia? >> >> That would be a concern for a web-console, in my opinion, which should work >> with any configuration of ActiveMQ, even when jolokia is disabled. With >> that said, even if this is not great as a web-console, it is a welcome tool >> for ActiveMQ users. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-web-console-tp4704522p4704622.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> -- Clebert Suconic
