Ah, makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
Tim
On Aug 4, 2017 7:35 AM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote:
Oh.. duh... apologize... I misread this through the iPhone yesterday..
I thought it was referring to Proxy to the connections:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1293
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017
Oh.. duh... apologize... I misread this through the iPhone yesterday..
I thought it was referring to Proxy to the connections:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1293
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Tim Bain wrote:
> Clebert, which feature were you referring to?
>
> On Aug 3, 2017 9
Clebert, which feature were you referring to?
On Aug 3, 2017 9:44 PM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote:
> There is a pending pull request in activemq artemis to add that feature.
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:51 AM Mark Raynsford <
> list+org.apache.activ...@io7m.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2017-08-03T08:57:38
Ah, that makes sense. Those class names are a little confusing, and so is
the term "discovery" since it sounds like it should mean "runtime discovery
of dynamic information" but static discovery actually means "discovery from
a config file."
Since it sounds like you aren't planning to continue usi
There is a pending pull request in activemq artemis to add that feature.
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:51 AM Mark Raynsford <
list+org.apache.activ...@io7m.com> wrote:
> On 2017-08-03T08:57:38 -0600
> Tim Bain wrote:
> >
> > My question was why you needed to subclass it in the first place.
>
> Ah, t
On 2017-08-03T08:57:38 -0600
Tim Bain wrote:
>
> My question was why you needed to subclass it in the first place.
Ah, that was down to an error in thinking on my part when looking at
the available network connectors. It went something like this: "Hm, need
a NetworkConnector. Don't seem to need '
My question was why you needed to subclass it in the first place.
On Aug 3, 2017 6:51 AM, "Mark Raynsford"
wrote:
> On 2017-08-03T06:29:48 -0600
> Tim Bain wrote:
>
> > OK, glad to hear that it's working properly now.
> >
> > But I'm surprised to hear that you think the existing classes don't d
On 2017-08-03T06:29:48 -0600
Tim Bain wrote:
> OK, glad to hear that it's working properly now.
>
> But I'm surprised to hear that you think the existing classes don't do what
> you want; what are you looking for that you couldn't get?
Sorry, that was phrased poorly. What I meant was that the a
OK, glad to hear that it's working properly now.
But I'm surprised to hear that you think the existing classes don't do what
you want; what are you looking for that you couldn't get?
Tim
On Aug 3, 2017 4:38 AM, "Mark Raynsford"
wrote:
> I discovered what the problem was.
>
> I'd created my own
I discovered what the problem was.
I'd created my own subclass of NetworkConnector, because none of the
existing implementations seemed to be what I needed. It turns out that
I actually needed to use DiscoveryNetworkConnector; the abstract
NetworkConnector base class doesn't actually do any useful
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Programatically-setting-up-a-proxying-broker-tp4729043p4729160.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
'Ello.
On 2017-08-02T00:19:48 -0700
tpavelka wrote:
> I know nothing about static destinations but one thing I noticed in your
> Github code: when you add network and transport connectors, you do not start
> them. I tested this with one of my sample ActiveMQ programs and if I don't
> start the c
o use:
org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnector#start
and
org.apache.activemq.network.NetworkConnector#start
HTH,
Tomas
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Programatically-setting-up-a-proxying-broker-tp4729043p4729158.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User ma
'Ello.
For the purposes of keeping everything consistent, I've pushed my
example program to a GitHub repository:
https://github.com/io7m/activemq-examples
See:
https://github.com/io7m/activemq-examples/blob/develop/src/main/java/com/io7m/activemq/examples/ForwardingServers.java
I've also
OK, no subscriber on the proxy broker certainly explains why no messages
are making it to the main broker, so let's dig into that.
Do you see (via JMX) a networkConnector between the two brokers? And do you
see advisory messages passing from the main broker to the proxy when a
subscriber connects?
Still no luck, unfortunately. This is the test program I'm using now:
http://ataxia.io7m.com/2017/07/31/ForwardingServers.java
I use setDynamicallyIncludedDestinations() with a wildcard topic ">". I
still see no subscriptions on the proxy broker from the receiver broker.
--
Mark Raynsford | h
On 2017-07-31T06:55:07 -0600
Tim Bain wrote:
> People do what you're trying to do, so this is a use case that works (or at
> least, did work at some point in the past).
Right.
> My advice when message forwarding isn't working in a network of brokers is
> to use JMX to figure out what's going on
People do what you're trying to do, so this is a use case that works (or at
least, did work at some point in the past).
My advice when message forwarding isn't working in a network of brokers is
to use JMX to figure out what's going on in each broker. I'd start with the
proxy broker and confirm th
Hm, is anyone out there actually using ActiveMQ in this manner?
The reason I'm doing this is that I'm considering deploying message
brokers in a manner analogous to the way in which one would
typically deploy mail servers: Programs on a server communicate with an
MTA (such as Postfix or qmail) on
Slightly shorter and simpler example here:
http://ataxia.io7m.com/2017/07/30/ForwardingServers.java
I've tried to step through the broker code in a debugger, but I'm not
familiar with the ActiveMQ sources, and regardless it's pretty tough to
use a debugger to find problems of the class "nothing
On 2017-07-29T18:57:30 -0600
Tim Bain wrote:
> If you use the TCP transport for the networkConnector between the brokers,
> does it work? I've got a half-memory of a mailing list post where someone
> found that the NIO transport didn't work in a networkConnector, but I can't
> find it now so it's
If you use the TCP transport for the networkConnector between the brokers,
does it work? I've got a half-memory of a mailing list post where someone
found that the NIO transport didn't work in a networkConnector, but I can't
find it now so it's possible I'm misremembering.
Tim
On Jul 29, 2017 2:0
'Lo.
I'm experimenting with configuring a broker P that will simply forward
all messages to a remote broker R. There will not be any subscribers
directly accessing P (but multiple producers will send messages to
queues and topics on P to be forwarded to R).
I have the following small example prog
23 matches
Mail list logo
