OK, glad to hear that it's working properly now. But I'm surprised to hear that you think the existing classes don't do what you want; what are you looking for that you couldn't get?
Tim On Aug 3, 2017 4:38 AM, "Mark Raynsford" <list+org.apache.activ...@io7m.com> wrote: > I discovered what the problem was. > > I'd created my own subclass of NetworkConnector, because none of the > existing implementations seemed to be what I needed. It turns out that > I actually needed to use DiscoveryNetworkConnector; the abstract > NetworkConnector base class doesn't actually do any useful work. > > -- > Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com >
