Ah, makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. Tim
On Aug 4, 2017 7:35 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: Oh.. duh... apologize... I misread this through the iPhone yesterday.. I thought it was referring to Proxy to the connections: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1293 On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > Clebert, which feature were you referring to? > > On Aug 3, 2017 9:44 PM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is a pending pull request in activemq artemis to add that feature. >> >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:51 AM Mark Raynsford < >> list+org.apache.activ...@io7m.com> wrote: >> >> > On 2017-08-03T08:57:38 -0600 >> > Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: >> > > >> > > My question was why you needed to subclass it in the first place. >> > >> > Ah, that was down to an error in thinking on my part when looking at >> > the available network connectors. It went something like this: "Hm, need >> > a NetworkConnector. Don't seem to need 'discovery', don't seem to need >> > 'multicast', don't seem to need LDAP... Guess I'm supposed to provide >> > my own subclass". I only realized my mistake when I tracked down which >> > subclass is instantiated for the broker when running the binary >> > distribution from the command line (DiscoveryNetworkConnector). >> > >> > -- >> > Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com >> > >> -- >> Clebert Suconic >> -- Clebert Suconic
