Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-12-02 Thread spamtrap
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:30:51 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/27/2015 03:38 AM, spam trap wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:03:35 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/26/2015 08:24 AM, spamtrap wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 11/26/20

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-27 Thread Timothy Bish
On 11/27/2015 03:38 AM, spam trap wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:03:35 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/26/2015 08:24 AM, spamtrap wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish >>> wrote: >>> On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -05

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-27 Thread spam trap
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:03:35 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/26/2015 08:24 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 11/25/201

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-26 Thread Timothy Bish
On 11/26/2015 08:24 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >>> wrote: >>> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -050

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-26 Thread spamtrap
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 11/25/201

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-26 Thread Timothy Bish
On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >>> wrote: >>> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -050

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-26 Thread spamtrap
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 11/25/201

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-25 Thread Timothy Bish
On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish >>> wrote: >>> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: > Hi, > > I have the follo

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-25 Thread spamtrap
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: Hi, I have the following code: cms::Message *pMessage; ...

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-25 Thread Timothy Bish
On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish > wrote: > >> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have the following code: >>> >>> cms::Message *pMessage; >>> ... >>> std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); >>> >>>

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-25 Thread spamtrap
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish wrote: >On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have the following code: >> >> cms::Message *pMessage; >> ... >> std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); >> >> According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames

Re: Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-25 Thread Timothy Bish
On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following code: > > cms::Message *pMessage; > ... > std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); > > According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames is on the > stack BTW. > > ==27758== 50,039,920 (289,968 direct, 49

Possible memory leak with ActiveMQ-CPP

2015-11-25 Thread spam trap
Hi, I have the following code: cms::Message *pMessage; ... std::vector propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames(); According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames is on the stack BTW. ==27758== 50,039,920 (289,968 direct, 49,749,952 indirect) bytes in 6,041 blocks are definitely lost