On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:30:51 -0500, Timothy Bish
<tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/27/2015 03:38 AM, spam trap wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:03:35 -0500, Timothy Bish
>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/26/2015 08:24 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>>>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>>>>>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have the following code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> cms::Message *pMessage;
>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> std::vector<std::string> propertyNames =
>>>>>>>>>>>> pMessage->getPropertyNames();
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames is on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> stack BTW.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ==27758== 50,039,920 (289,968 direct, 49,749,952 indirect) bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6,041 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 383 of 384
>>>>>>>>>>>> ==27758== at 0x4A075FC: operator new(unsigned long)
>>>>>>>>>>>> (vg_replace_malloc.c:298)
>>>>>>>>>>>> ==27758== by 0x5F77EF9: decaf::util::StlMap<std::string,
>>>>>>>>>>>> activemq::util::PrimitiveValueNode,
>>>>>>>>>>>> decaf::util::comparators::Less<std::string> >::keySet() const
>>>>>>>>>>>> (StlMap.h:866)
>>>>>>>>>>>> ==27758== by 0x5C3799E:
>>>>>>>>>>>> activemq::commands::ActiveMQMessageTemplate<cms::BytesMessage>::getPropertyNames()
>>>>>>>>>>>> const (ActiveMQMessageTemplate.h:109)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >From a quick code inspection I don't see any case where a leak can
>>>>>>>>>>> occur. If you can add a test case to the existing set of unit
>>>>>>>>>>> tests for
>>>>>>>>>>> the Message objects to reproduce the valgrind complaint I will look
>>>>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Try adding something to
>>>>>>>>>>> src/test/activemq/commands/ActiveMQMessageTest.h/cpp
>>>>>>>>>> Where are the binaries placed for the test programs? I can't seem to
>>>>>>>>>> find them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Depends on how you are building them, what is the environment and
>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>> process?
>>>>>>>> Linux 64 bit. I've run:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> configure ....
>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>> make install
>>>>>>>> make check
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So on Linux the autotools the build process will place the executables
>>>>>>> in the directory that map to the application being created.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So for instance if you want to build the unit tests the executable is in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./src/test/ and is called activemq-test I believe.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I generally use a build folder to keep the source and intermediate files
>>>>>>> separate, to test and check for leaks I use a process something like the
>>>>>>> following.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cd activemq-cpp
>>>>>>> mkdir ./build
>>>>>>> ./autogen.sh
>>>>>> I get this:
>>>>>> "configure.ac:122: ' is not a type"
>>>>>> Is this a problem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cd build
>>>>>>> ../configure --enable-shared=no CXXFLAGS="-g -O0"
>>>>>>> make check -j 8
>>>>>> "make: *** No rule to make target `check'. Stop."
>>>>>> [There's no makefile in the build directory]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> make -f ../Makefile also does not work:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh
>>>>>> /home/me/activemq/activemq-cpp-library-3.9.0/config/missing --run
>>>>>> aclocal-1.11 -I m4
>>>>>> aclocal-1.11: `configure.ac' or `configure.in' is required
>>>>>> make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./src/test/activemq-test
>>>>>> There's no file of this name anywhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>> If you are having trouble try clone the git repo and working with that,
>>>>> I built that code yesterday without issue.
>>>> I've just tried this and I get the same result. I notice that 'make
>>>> check' does not even attempt to build anything in src/test. I wonder
>>>> if it's because cppunit is not installed in a 'standard' location?
>>>>
>>> That could be an issue, you'd need to debug it on your side to find out
>>> for sure.
>> I have built the test programs now and added a test for my case.
>> However I don't see the memory leak being reported by valgrind in the
>> test program -- strange the difference.
>>
>>
>Makes sense to check your application to ensure you are freeing message
>instances as that could lead to a leak of this area being reported.
I am but I haven't found anything useful yet.
