On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:06:15 -0500, Timothy Bish
<tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/26/2015 03:07 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:39:53 -0500, Timothy Bish
>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:53 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/25/2015 10:50 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:33:38 -0500, Timothy Bish
>>>>>> <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/25/2015 05:47 AM, spam trap wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have the following code:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cms::Message *pMessage;
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> std::vector<std::string> propertyNames = pMessage->getPropertyNames();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to valgrind this leaks memory. propertyNames is on the
>>>>>>>> stack BTW.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ==27758== 50,039,920 (289,968 direct, 49,749,952 indirect) bytes in
>>>>>>>> 6,041 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 383 of 384
>>>>>>>> ==27758== at 0x4A075FC: operator new(unsigned long)
>>>>>>>> (vg_replace_malloc.c:298)
>>>>>>>> ==27758== by 0x5F77EF9: decaf::util::StlMap<std::string,
>>>>>>>> activemq::util::PrimitiveValueNode,
>>>>>>>> decaf::util::comparators::Less<std::string> >::keySet() const
>>>>>>>> (StlMap.h:866)
>>>>>>>> ==27758== by 0x5C3799E:
>>>>>>>> activemq::commands::ActiveMQMessageTemplate<cms::BytesMessage>::getPropertyNames()
>>>>>>>> const (ActiveMQMessageTemplate.h:109)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >From a quick code inspection I don't see any case where a leak can
>>>>>>> occur. If you can add a test case to the existing set of unit tests for
>>>>>>> the Message objects to reproduce the valgrind complaint I will look
>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try adding something to
>>>>>>> src/test/activemq/commands/ActiveMQMessageTest.h/cpp
>>>>>> Where are the binaries placed for the test programs? I can't seem to
>>>>>> find them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Depends on how you are building them, what is the environment and build
>>>>> process?
>>>> Linux 64 bit. I've run:
>>>>
>>>> configure ....
>>>> make
>>>> make install
>>>> make check
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So on Linux the autotools the build process will place the executables
>>> in the directory that map to the application being created.
>>>
>>> So for instance if you want to build the unit tests the executable is in
>>>
>>> ./src/test/ and is called activemq-test I believe.
>>>
>>> I generally use a build folder to keep the source and intermediate files
>>> separate, to test and check for leaks I use a process something like the
>>> following.
>>>
>>> cd activemq-cpp
>>> mkdir ./build
>>> ./autogen.sh
>> I get this:
>> "configure.ac:122: ' is not a type"
>> Is this a problem?
>>
>>> cd build
>>> ../configure --enable-shared=no CXXFLAGS="-g -O0"
>>> make check -j 8
>> "make: *** No rule to make target `check'. Stop."
>> [There's no makefile in the build directory]
>>
>> make -f ../Makefile also does not work:
>>
>> CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh
>> /home/me/activemq/activemq-cpp-library-3.9.0/config/missing --run
>> aclocal-1.11 -I m4
>> aclocal-1.11: `configure.ac' or `configure.in' is required
>> make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1
>>
>>
>>> ./src/test/activemq-test
>> There's no file of this name anywhere.
>>
>If you are having trouble try clone the git repo and working with that,
>I built that code yesterday without issue.
I've just tried this and I get the same result. I notice that 'make
check' does not even attempt to build anything in src/test. I wonder
if it's because cppunit is not installed in a 'standard' location?
