>
> Rob Davies
> http://twitter.com/rajdavies
> I work here: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
> I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25613901.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
st will be out of luck with
using 5.3
when it is released. This is of course if it is a problem with 5.3.
Could anyone at least reply if they have JDBC Master/Slave working
with
version 5.3 of ActiveMQ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-
.3.
Could anyone at least reply if they have JDBC Master/Slave working with
version 5.3 of ActiveMQ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25575327.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt;>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> directory="${activemq.base}/data&q
;>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> createTablesOnStartup="false" />
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> keyStore
Zip file uploaded...
http://www.nabble.com/file/p25458793/ConsoleApplication1.zip
ConsoleApplication1.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25458793.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
t;>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> class="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataSource"
>>>>>> destroy-method="close">
>>>>>>>>>>> value="com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver"/>
>&g
3
>>>>> ;databaseName=ActiveMQProductRequest;user=GL$ACTIVEMQ_PRODUCTREQUEST;password=replenish"/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/admin" logUrlOnStart="true"/>
>>>> >>> resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/camel" logUrlOnStart="true"/>
>>>> >>> resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/demo" log
t;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://mortbay.com/schemas/jetty/1.0";>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >> resourceBase="${activemq.base}
ourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/demo" logUrlOnStart="true"/>
>> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/fileserver" logUrlOnStart="true"/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
ase}/webapps/camel" logUrlOnStart="true"/>
>> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/demo" logUrlOnStart="true"/>
>> > resourceBase="${activemq.base}/webapps/fileserver" logUrlOnStart="true"/>
>>
>
> > We are aiming to get a 5.3 release candidate to vote on next week - so
> > no long
> > On 4 Sep 2009, at 19:46, magellings wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Right now we're focusing pretty hard on stress testing version 5.2
> >> but we can
>
negative
number and messages received was greater than number sent. We
determined
there were indeed duplicate messages being sent.
We ended up setting useCache to false on the queue policy entry
and
the
problem appears to be resolved.
We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues
;>> number and messages received was greater than number sent. We
>>>> determined
>>>> there were indeed duplicate messages being sent.
>>>>
>>>> We ended up setting useCache to false on the queue policy entry and
>>>> the
>>>
being sent.
We ended up setting useCache to false on the queue policy entry and
the
problem appears to be resolved.
We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues
relatively
quickly.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-mes
o false on the queue policy entry and
>> the
>> problem appears to be resolved.
>>
>> We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues relatively
>> quickly.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-nega
resolved.
>>
>> We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues relatively
>> quickly.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25295148.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Us
the queue policy entry and
the
problem appears to be resolved.
We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues relatively
quickly.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25295148.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
resolved.
We too were sending a high volume of messages to our queues relatively
quickly.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25295148.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
sadmin to
> upgrade. Anyone know the bug report that matches my problem? I found
> http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1940, but I am not clearing the
> purging a queue, it just simply happens during normal processing.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> View this message in context
I found
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1940, but I am not clearing the
purging a queue, it just simply happens during normal processing.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p22106707.html
Sent from the Ac
22 matches
Mail list logo
