sorry to hear that Mark - do you have a test case ?
On 24 Sep 2009, at 16:08, magellings wrote:
Hello. I haven't gotten any feedback on this issue. To me seems
rather
important as JDBC Master/Slave is a common configuration and if it
doesn't
work with the NMS provider we at least will be out of luck with
using 5.3
when it is released. This is of course if it is a problem with 5.3.
Could anyone at least reply if they have JDBC Master/Slave working
with
version 5.3 of ActiveMQ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25575327.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
