Ah, makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
Tim
On Aug 4, 2017 7:35 AM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote:
Oh.. duh... apologize... I misread this through the iPhone yesterday..
I thought it was referring to Proxy to the connections:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1293
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017
Oh.. duh... apologize... I misread this through the iPhone yesterday..
I thought it was referring to Proxy to the connections:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1293
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Tim Bain wrote:
> Clebert, which feature were you referring to?
>
> On Aug 3, 2017 9
Clebert, which feature were you referring to?
On Aug 3, 2017 9:44 PM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote:
> There is a pending pull request in activemq artemis to add that feature.
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:51 AM Mark Raynsford <
> list+org.apache.activ...@io7m.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2017-08-03T08:57:38
Ah, that makes sense. Those class names are a little confusing, and so is
the term "discovery" since it sounds like it should mean "runtime discovery
of dynamic information" but static discovery actually means "discovery from
a config file."
Since it sounds like you aren't planning to continue usi
There is a pending pull request in activemq artemis to add that feature.
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:51 AM Mark Raynsford <
list+org.apache.activ...@io7m.com> wrote:
> On 2017-08-03T08:57:38 -0600
> Tim Bain wrote:
> >
> > My question was why you needed to subclass it in the first place.
>
> Ah, t
On 2017-08-03T08:57:38 -0600
Tim Bain wrote:
>
> My question was why you needed to subclass it in the first place.
Ah, that was down to an error in thinking on my part when looking at
the available network connectors. It went something like this: "Hm, need
a NetworkConnector. Don't seem to need '
My question was why you needed to subclass it in the first place.
On Aug 3, 2017 6:51 AM, "Mark Raynsford"
wrote:
> On 2017-08-03T06:29:48 -0600
> Tim Bain wrote:
>
> > OK, glad to hear that it's working properly now.
> >
> > But I'm surprised to hear that you think the existing classes don't d
On 2017-08-03T06:29:48 -0600
Tim Bain wrote:
> OK, glad to hear that it's working properly now.
>
> But I'm surprised to hear that you think the existing classes don't do what
> you want; what are you looking for that you couldn't get?
Sorry, that was phrased poorly. What I meant was that the a
OK, glad to hear that it's working properly now.
But I'm surprised to hear that you think the existing classes don't do what
you want; what are you looking for that you couldn't get?
Tim
On Aug 3, 2017 4:38 AM, "Mark Raynsford"
wrote:
> I discovered what the problem was.
>
> I'd created my own
I discovered what the problem was.
I'd created my own subclass of NetworkConnector, because none of the
existing implementations seemed to be what I needed. It turns out that
I actually needed to use DiscoveryNetworkConnector; the abstract
NetworkConnector base class doesn't actually do any useful
10 matches
Mail list logo
