1665f0f15e/transport/src/main/java/io/netty/channel/Channel.java#L147
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 10:26 AM William Crowell
wrote:
> Is there any reason why the following code would return the IPv6 loopback
> address and not the actual physical IPv4 address of the cl
return true;
}
}
This prints out: RemotingConnection: [0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]:46682
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.
co
On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 23:05, William Crowell
wrote:
> In Apache Artemis Is it possible to send the external IP of clients
> publishing messages in a message header and/or property or add something to
> the broker configuration to put it in the message payload? I know that
> co
In Apache Artemis Is it possible to send the external IP of clients publishing
messages in a message header and/or property or add something to the broker
configuration to put it in the message payload? I know that connection routers
have access to the SOURCE_IP.
Regards,
William Crowell
My apologies but I meant ActiveMQ Classic and not Artemis.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: William Crowell
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Linux Specific Tuning For Apache Artemis
Good afternoon.
Are there any additional Linux specific tuning
Good afternoon.
Are there any additional Linux specific tuning guidelines for Apache Artemis
than what is provided in the following link:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/perf-tuning.html
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is
: null
…
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2025 at 3:54 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Artemis 2.40.0: Strange File Locking Behavior On NFSv4
> Is there a way to set the lock check interval
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.FileLockNodeManager? It seems
like it checks several times a second according to the debug logs and the
source code.
This is some configuration issue or bug with NFS or network related issue as
you stated.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date
. Sent you the logs directly.
All options are valid in that link except for intr which was removed. I am
verifying the Linux kernel build version, but it should be very recent.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2025 at 12:57 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
[org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.FileLockNodeManager] acquired
primary node lock state = L
2025-05-01 15:07:05,186 DEBUG
[org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.FileLockNodeManager] touched
/data/server.lock; new time: 1746112025184
…
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2025
]
AMQ221002: Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Message Broker version 2.40.0
[339308e1-25f3-11f0-996a-0200ec1b9c8e] stopped, uptime 52.978 seconds
…
Regards,
William Crowell
From: William Crowell
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2025 at 9:20 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Apache Artemis 2.40.0: Strange File
e as expected.
What am I missing here?
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.
Justin,
Thanks that helps! From a high level does that look like I have configured a
shared store correctly? Anything I left out?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Monday, April 28, 2025 at 11:30 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Artemis: Is a cluster
true
true
true
…
Would this be considered a symmetrical cluster?
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended
returned by this
servlet?
I know there are optional metrics that you can enable/disable:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/metrics.html#optional-metrics
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are
, but typically 10M is good for most
systems.
The configuration would look like the following in broker.xml:
...
true
ASYNCIO
./data/bindings
./data/journal
true
4
-1
4096
20M
12000
1000
...
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may co
Correction: I am using the RedHat Artemis Prometheus Metrics Plugin.
I should have added my configuration as well:
true
true
true
true
true
true
Regards,
William Crowell
From: William Crowell
://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/perf-tuning.html
There have been some Linux OS changes we have made, but the gains from those
changes are marginal.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 10:15 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject
-up-broker-cluster-configuring#common-broker-cluster-topologies-configuring
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 9:37 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: What HA Replication Policy Is For Active-Active Topology
I lost the plot somewhere along
Justin,
So, you would definitely need one cluster with 2 brokers and another cluster
with at least one preferably two brokers as well?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 9:25 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: What HA Replication
Vilius,
Have one cluster defined as a single broker and another cluster defined with a
single broker as well just to meet the HA requirement.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Vilius Šumskas
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 9:11 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: What HA
Vilius,
Thank you for your reply. Can we do 2 broker clusters of 1 node each with HA
on top? The HA piece only cares whether a cluster is defined and not
necessarily if it is a health cluster.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Vilius Šumskas
Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 8:23 AM
To: users
move to
a clustered configuration. Only add complexity when there is a clear benefit.”
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Domenico Francesco Bruscino
Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 6:15 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: What HA Replication Policy Is For Active-Active Topology
Hi
/main/examples/features/ha
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.
7C%7C%7C&sdata=m79H6u9ZyyHIh%2FEmhHzhyNCgWnqwx8Rl6n9FUMmJukw%3D&reserved=0<https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/using-server.html#creating-a-broker-instance>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 3:43 PM William Crowell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any documentation on cr
here:
https://docs.digital.ai/deploy/docs/24.1/how-to/configuring-artemis-jms-ha-setup
I wondered if there was a specific link on the Apache Artemis site for this.
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended
I am wondering if Apache Kafka might be more feasible for something like this.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 3:26 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Maximum Amount of Topic/Queues Within Apache Artemis
That's it.
Justin
O
ease the
amount of data fetched by lowering the "Max depth" and "Max collection size."
Regards,
William Crowell
From: William Crowell
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 3:12 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Maximum Amount of Topic/Queues Within Apache Artemis
J
several devices that have JMS clients that communicate with the
broker on topics and durable queues. By “several devices” I mean maybe 100s or
1000s.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 2:57 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Maximum Amount
Alexander,
Thanks for your reply. Are you using the G1GC garbage collector or something
else?
Are you using durable or non-durable queues?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Alexander Milovidov
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 2:08 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Maximum Amount
it scalable?
Regards and have a great day,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.
Matt,
Thanks for your response. I suspect network latency could be an issue because
I am not seeing any other indicators causing a problem. I will investigate
that further and get back to you.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Matt Pavlovich
Date: Thursday, February 27, 2025 at 11:51 AM
To
factory.alwaysSessionAsync=false
factory.prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=2000
factory.prefetchPolicy.queueBrowserPrefetch=1000
factory.useAsyncSend=true
Is there anything I am forgetting to increase throughput? I feel like I am
leaving something silly out.
Regards,
William Crowell
Christian,
Really good information. What was the clock speed on your cores? What was
your CEPH running on? SSD?
What did you use to performance test? I found a Maven plugin and JMeter
scripts.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Christian Kurmann
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 1
-1000 bytes. I think we would need some really beefy
hardware for Classic to support this kind of traffic. Our clients are coded
against Classic library, so it would be difficult to switch to Artemis.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 10:37 AM
To
Justin,
I have not tried that. I am trying to push management to use Artemis instead
of Classic because I think Artemis will perform better for their heavy workload.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 11:48 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Matt,
Thank you and that is very valuable information.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Matt Pavlovich
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 11:31 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
Hi William—
Keep in mind that ActiveMQ
Justin,
It would be OpenWire.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 10:56 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?
Which "Classic library" are you referring to? Artemi
,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.
Hi,
I am using Apache Artemis 2.31.2 on Ubuntu. Are there any issues having over
11,000 addresses defined in Apache Artemis? Is this scalable? I do notice the
management interface is a bit slow from loading all the address information.
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain
are moved over. Is
this assumption correct?
Thank you in advance,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.
e/activemq-artemis/blob/2.34.0/artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/cluster/impl/ClusterConnectionImpl.java#L1439
Your explanation of the IDs on the source and target seem to explain it if that
is the case.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Tuesda
Good morning,
Does anyone have an idea why the name of cluster in certain bindings is a
concatenation of two cluster ids? I keep seeing this in the logs.
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient
database entry.
That entry is then sent over Artemis to notify other server, so that call rings
on users logged into respective servers.”
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Thursday, May 30, 2024 at 4:34 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: AMQ222139
Let me provide a
are temporary. Would this cause a problem in the distribution
of messages?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: William Crowell
Date: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 5:13 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: AMQ222139
Justin,
This randomly happens throughout the day. We are not sure what is
accounts active at a time, so the topic
number should be around that number. I would estimate we produce 1-3 messages
per account per second which ends up being between 50,000,00 and 200,000,000
messages per day.
We have a 3-node Artemis cluster.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Justin,
I do not think I have that situation:
…
artemis
ON_DEMAND
1
node0
node1
…
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 3:57 PM
.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 1:29 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: AMQ222139
As far as I know the only conditions that would result in this situation
are described in the warning message.
Do you have multiple cluster connections to the
Hi,
What would cause AMQ222139? I have max-hops set to 1.
2024-05-24 17:28:04,155 WARN [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
AMQ222139: MessageFlowRecordImpl [nodeID=2135063f-0407-11ef-9fff-0242ac110002,
connector=TransportConfiguration(name=artemis,
factory=org-apache-activemq-artemis-c
these topics to combat
the issue.
I noticed there is a messagesAcknowledged and messagesAcknowledged fields on
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl. messagesAcknowledge is
usually zero on these queues which take a lot of heap.
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may
Another question I would have is: Are unrouted messages kept in memory or just
dropped?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: William Crowell
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 2:36 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unrouted Message Count and Address Size Metrics
Alexander,
Thank you for
Alexander,
Thank you for your reply. Where did you get that description? I did not see
it in the metrics plugin you shared.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Alexander Milovidov
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 11:46 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unrouted Message Count and
unless I missed
something:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/2.13.0/metrics.html
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and
instance size or horizontally
scaling?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 at 10:13 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.QueueImpl Instances
There should just be one instance of QueueImpl per queue. Keep in
.
Does this mean there are 894 different queues defined or are multiple instances
of QueueImpl created per queue?
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
Good afternoon,
Does anyone know when ARTEMIS-4420 will be pushed into a release? Any plans on
putting it in 2.33.1 or 2.34.0?
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail
Robbie,
That makes sense and thank you for your reply. I may create a variant of
JMeter AMQP Plugin that can work with AMQP 1.0 protocol standard.
Do you or anyone know of any alternatives for performance testing Apache
Artemis?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Robbie Gemmell
Date: Friday
]
Anyone know of tools out there to performance test Apache Artemis?
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.
q/artemis/core/server/plugin/ActiveMQServerConnectionPlugin.java#L45
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:38 AM William Crowell
wrote:
> Justin,
>
> Yes, MQTT.
>
> I am talking about disorderly disconnects like client crash, network
> problem, etc.
>
> Regarding messages dropping…I am not ex
s is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
1) What protocol are you using for takeover with duplicate client IDs? MQTT?
2) Are you talking about orderly disconnects (e.g. a client calling close()
on its connection) or disconnects caused by a client crash, network
problem, e
create to detect this?
3) Is there a way to detect dropped messages and why they were dropped?
Anything available in JMX?
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
Good afternoon,
Are there any rules for special characters that can or cannot be used in
setting a user’s password when connecting to Artemis?
Regards,
William Crowell
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please
62 matches
Mail list logo
