Justin, For instance, this log message: "Cannot find binding for 034b3024-1889-11ef-aeed-0242ac1100029a5d5fea-03fb-11ef-acb5-0242ac110002"
This message comes out of org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl on line 1439: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/2.34.0/artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/cluster/impl/ClusterConnectionImpl.java#L1439 Your explanation of the IDs on the source and target seem to explain it if that is the case. Regards, William Crowell From: Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> Date: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 at 6:17 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org <users@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Re: Any idea on why the cluster name would be a concatenation of 2 cluster IDs Can you be more specific? Off the top of my head I'm not sure if this is expected or not. It might be that the name is based on the IDs of the source and target. I need more details in order to investigate. Justin On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:11 AM William Crowell <wcrow...@perforce.com.invalid> wrote: > Good morning, > > Does anyone have an idea why the name of cluster in certain bindings is a > concatenation of two cluster ids? I keep seeing this in the logs. > > Regards, > > William Crowell > > > This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If > you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any > attachments and notify us immediately. > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
