details.
Hope that helps,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 29 Oct 2014, at 16:05 pm, khandelwalanuj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does clients need to make any changes or include any jars to connect to
> ActiveMQ broker nodes which are using replicated levelDB.
Hello,
I doubt there is any further documentation than the page you already listed:
http://activemq.apache.org/leveldb-store.html
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 29 Oct 2014, at 11:59 am, khandelwalanuj wrote:
> Yes !! Is there any place where we can f
available right after startup on the slave broker
as well.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 19 Feb 2014, at 07:29 am, ramdassv wrote:
> Here is the my implementation we have in production, We have Master Slave
> with LevelDB for persistence. For some reason when Master nod
For security reasons its better if you convert your Open Office document into
PDF format or plain text and attach it again.
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 18 Feb 2014, at 08:35 am, led wrote:
> Dears,
>
> I need Manufacturer's Information on I
that simulates your
production load.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 12 Feb 2014, at 11:10 am, khandelwalanuj wrote:
Hi,
By Default KahaDb cleanupInterval is 30 seconds. I think this is very small
duration for cleanup. For broker with heavy load this interval is very small
By default the broker name is hardcoded in your conf/activemq.xml.
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName=“localhost” …
>
So the broker name should not change automatically when creating a new
installation.
Does perhaps your auto installer change this name?
Regards,
a higher number of destinations.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 20 Jan 2014, at 12:13 pm, Torsten Mielke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When you disable dedicatedTaskRunner the broker uses an internal thread pool
> just as you mentioned already.
> A thread from the po
connection (only one thread per active
connection) and generally the thread count should get reduced.
Hope this helps,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 17 Jan 2014, at 09:48 am, khandelwalanuj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reference:
> If we disable "dedicatedTaskRunner"
Hello,
Can you please describe your problem in a bit more detail?
Consumers should generally not get suspended, producers will be when they hit
producer flow control.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:25 pm, zengli wrote:
> When the cache message,
reached (i.e. tempUsage
limit in broker configuration)?
In case you are sending persistent messages to your topic check if the
storeUsage limit got reached as well.
But again, the broker should log if any limit is reached.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 19 Jan 2014, at 07
In general the use of a pooling aware JMS ConnectionFactory such as ActiveMQs
PooledConnectionFactory is *always* recommended. Particularly in Camel which
uses Spring JMS underneath.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 16 Jan 2014, at 10:54 am, Jose María Zaragoza wrote
Hello,
The rest interface should be enabled in 5.9.
What problem do you get when trying to use it? Any errors in the broker log
file?
Can you confirm that port 8161 is open and in use by the broker?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 15 Jan 2014, at 13:21 pm, hemartins wrote
Hi,
You can secure the broker using authentication and authorisation and hence
restrict what users are able to access the broker and write to destinations.
See http://activemq.apache.org/security.html for more details.
Hope this helps
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 13 Jan 2014, at
CachingConnectionFactory and re-test again.
I would hope the problem is gone.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
[1]
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/3.0.5.RELEASE/api/org/springframework/jms/connection/CachingConnectionFactory.html#isCacheConsumers()
On 14 Jan 2014, at 09:47 am, Ayelet
Hello,
You may want to post your question on the Camel users list as this is a Camel
related problem.
The idea would be to use a dynamic recipient list [1] and not hard code the
queue destination in your route.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
[1] http
not aware of any bugs in this area, so its likely a user / configuration
problem.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 13 Jan 2014, at 10:09 am, Michael Priess
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hi I actually use Apache Camel 2.10.1 in combination with ActiveMQ 5.7.0.
>
> To build
Something did reset the tcp connection from your client into the broker.
Was it perhaps the broker itself (not sure why it would do this though other
when shutting down) or do you have a firewall between your client and broker
that could have closed the connection?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
update the brokerPath as well.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On 06 Jan 2014, at 18:09 pm, WhitestarB5
wrote:
> We have a queue which contains Json Messages. They do not tend to be large
> messages.
> We are experiencing an odd behaviour where mess
Which version of ActiveMQ are you using?
I have seen these errors on older versions but not lately.
Perhaps upgrading is a solution?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 14, 2013, at 14:19 PM,
wrote:
> How would a journal file go 'missing'?
Have you considered using jps -l -m instead of the ps command?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 14, 2013, at 01:23 AM, HellKnight wrote:
> Mr. Mielke:
> Quote from your post:
> 1063855181 71497 71476 0 0:00.38 ttys0150:04.99
> /Sy
I don't seem to get that much output when running your command [1].
What more do you get?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
[1]
$ ps -ef|grep activemq
1063855181 71500 66770 0 0:00.00 ttys0140:00.00 grep activemq
1063855181 71476 66810 0 0:00.01 ttys0150:00.01
xpires and also it is converted to a persistence message, even if it
> is non persistence.
Not entirely sure but would have thought non-persistent expired messages are
simply deleted by the broker and not moved to DLQ?
The rest of your claim is correct.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
rhaps running
it external to the ServiceMix installation.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 6, 2013, at 15:14 PM, cristisor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are using Apache ServiceMix 3.6.0-fuse-00-89 with ActiveMQ
> 5.5.1-fuse-00-89. Lately, a very
, the broker will remove it.
You could also consider using constantPendingMessageLimitStrategy as explained
in
http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html
Hope this helps.
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 6, 2013, at 14:26 PM, johnbing wrote:
Hello Nicolas,
If you have a stable VPN connection into the partners network, you should
bypass the firewall and have no problems connecting to a broker.
Alternatively the http transport could help.
http://activemq.apache.org/http-and-https-transports-reference.html
Torsten Mielke
tmie
so you need to assign a unique role to your special
user and grant read/write/admin rights to that role on your destination t*.
This should work.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 18, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Shine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to s
How are the brokers on server1 and server2 connected? Do they form a
master/slave pair based on shared storage or are they connected via a network
bridge?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:17 PM, moodycl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
they have failed later.
>
> How to configure TTL for messages in DLQ?
Not sure there is a way but there is a broker plugin that can clean the DLQ
periodically.
See the section "The Discarding DLQ Plugin" on
http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html
Hope this
.
15000 message * 200 KB = 2.86 GB
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 14, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Marinad wrote:
> I use ActiveMQ 5.8.0
>
> I have network of two brokers. I'm using Broker Redelivery Plugin with 10
> redeliveries. Also DLQ handling i
Hi Oleg,
You may also be interested in this post
http://timbish.blogspot.de/2013/07/coming-in-activemq-59-new-way-to-abort.html
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Oleg Dulin wrote:
> Dear Distinguished Colleagues:
>
> I w
I am not aware of any such mechanism you're looking for but perhaps these
message limit strategies can help you instead
http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Oleg Dulin
Hello Lu,
This sounds like a bug to me. Can you please create a JUnit test and raise a
bug report?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 11, 2013, at 11:01 PM, rushalias wrote:
> Here is my setup
>
> I have a master/slave (apache-activ
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 12, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Frizz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there in ActiveMQ a concept like Interceptors and Phases like in Apache
> CXF?
>
> I'd like to plug in some custom functionality
the best topology depends on your use case.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:05 PM, Jose María Zaragoza wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm using ActiveMQ 5.8.0 and my client requires to install 3 brokers
> into 3 different servers
Hello,
Can you try
>
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; id="myPlugin"
> class="org.myorg.MyPlugin"/>
>
instead?
I recently got a destination interceptor to work that way and had to specify
the namespace for correctly.
Reg
-of-brokers.html
Hope this helps.
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:55 AM, turkuaz07 wrote:
> Which is the best protocol for activemq networks of brokers.tcp/ip, failover,
> Discovery ..
> It is important for me.Cuz For ex. I have 20 brok
ow
values for each of the settings above.
Hope this helps a bit.
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Paul Gale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a known algorithm or best practice folks use for determining
> values for memory usage
guide available at Red Hat using this link
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Fuse_MQ_Enterprise/7.1/html/Tuning_Guide/files/front.html
It may provide some useful tuning tips.
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Jul 14, 2013, at 2:21 PM, SuperUnknown wrote
Ca you connect an external consumer to this embedded broker (assuming the
broker opens up other transport listeners than vm:) and consume the messages?
If yes, then its probably an issue with your resource adapter config or your
MDB...
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Apr 17
Seems to be an issue with IBM JRE only.
Any idea where that class com.ibm.tools.attach.javaSE.AttachProvider resides?
Can you add its jar file to the classpath used by the stop script manually?
Torsten Mielke
tmie...@redhat.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Apr 18, 2013, at 4:28 PM, jandeclercq
Not sure if it helps in your case but can you try deleting the db.data index
file and restart your broker? It will then rebuild the index based on the
journal files. If the journal files are complete bogus though, this approach
may not help.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
interest to you:
http://tmielke.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/activemq-ldap-based-authentication-and.html
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Dec 5, 2012, at 1:22 PM, joesan wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have an LDAP configuration where I have 3 users namely admin,
jconsole that the consumer is unregistered from the
destination DATA after killing it?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:23 AM, rafiki wrote:
>
> I have the next situation:
>
> + An ActiveMQ stand alone Broker.
>
. Could this be your problem?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 26, 2012, at 9:41 PM, javatestcase wrote:
> Been trying to get ActiveMQ 5.7.0 running on JBossAS 5.1.0 set up to use a
> JMS to JMS bridge to copy every message from a queue on the
out the code directly from github
https://github.com/ebuzzing/bash-mq and not from the blog post referenced in
the earlier email. The latter may not work out of the box, the former does.
Thanks,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 23, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Christian
datafeeds.networkrail.co.uk could be incorrect.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 22, 2012, at 5:15 AM, topsweep1506 wrote:
> Hi Torsten
>
> Here are a few of the error messages ive been recieving when running
> activemq-stomp-my.xml (all i done to the defa
other application or assign a different free
port number to your JMS broker.
>
> I got all them from just changing the host and port of the activemq-stomp
> file and when i put it backk to default it works no problems
Yes, makes sense, see comment above.
> THANKS
t;
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/help-ruby-listener-publisher-tp4659540p4659591.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
;
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/help-ruby-listener-publisher-tp4659540p4659572.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
standalone.
If it runs embedded and the JVM is already JMX enabled, it will register into
that JMX context.
Hope this helps,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:11 PM, topsweep1506 wrote:
> Hi torsten sorry for bein a pain but im gettin stuck with
han activeMQ, and it make the system a extra single-point
Both alternatives are fine, hardened, tested and deployed in a good number of
environments.
You can go either way: jdbc master/slave or shared file system master/slave.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
hardcoded
default url.
The connection should then work.
Hope this helps,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 19, 2012, at 9:04 PM, topsweep1506 wrote:
> Hi im using the activemq broker ive added this to the conf\activemq.xml file
> or do i add this to th
What broker url did you specify?
Assuming you are talking the stomp protocol, make sure the broker configuration
starts a stomp transport listener, typically on port 61613. Use the same
host:port in your ruby client.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 19, 2012
fault avoids (un)marshaling your messages, which will boost
performance.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 18, 2012, at 8:38 AM, Michal Singer wrote:
> I am running some POC on Active MQ and
> I am encountering some serious performance issues:
&g
eally, attach a little unit test that
reproduces this behavior.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 16, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Juan Nin wrote:
> nope, adding a 3rd queue the 3rd one also gets this same value, so even if
> it's the memory usage o
I would expect the brokers MemoryPercentUsage won't
grow over 100% and the destinations MemoryPercentUsage remains fairly much at
70%.
Not sure why you would see a different behavior? Using an old version of AMQ
perhaps? Or explicitly configuring for the vmQueueCursor?
Could you perhaps also test with
>
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding and some of these settings make no sense when
> producerFlowControl is disabled?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Juan
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
/connection/SingleConnectionFactory.html
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Michal Singer wrote:
> Hi, according to this link:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/jmstemplate-gotchas.html
>
> there are problems
and route these to
your ActiveMQ broker.
That Camel route could also run inside your ActiveMQ broker JVM.
See my previous email and the links provided.
However I am not entirely sure if this is what you want.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
t;
> I’m looking to see if anyone has an example of the SQL query to OEG
> ActiveMQ.
> Thanks in advance for any help you may provide.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
t messages on DLQ can have different origins. There is a message
header that specifies the original destination name. The Camel route could
route messages based on this header.
Hope this helps.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Tobb wr
should behave just like an ordinary broker.
The slave broker won't even startup and load kahadb as it can't acquire the
lock on kahadb.
I have not tested this lately but would assume that this property works as
explained and only affects the producer, not the consumer.
Hello,
How about this Spring config?
You may want to set the redelivery policy on the ActiveMQConnectionFactory not
on the PooledConnectionFactory.
Is this what you are looking for?
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
e bridge got created on only one broker.
Nevertheless it should generally be okay to create duplex network connectors on
all broker instances. This should not result in errors.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Tors
.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I had to remove duplex from network of connectors. Does it mean I can't use
> duplex?
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>
>> Does
ther broker instance that you want to
connect to. You should not connect to your own instance in a brokers network
connector.
Hope this helps.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
Hi Tobb,
I have never noticed that button and don't think it can be re-enabled by some
configuration.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Nov 8, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Tobb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded ActiveMQ from version 5.3.0 to
imit of 200 which processes 200 msgs then disconnects. It is
> invoked by a scheduled job manager. I've changed this prefetch limit 1 now
> to see if it makes a difference under load this week.
>
>
> On 5 November 2012 10:18, Torsten Mielke wrote:
>
>> What version of Activ
, the duplicate should not get written to the
store in the first place.
If you're not at the latest and greatest version of ActiveMQ, I would suggest
to upgrade.
Otherwise it would be interesting to find out how to reproduce the problem so
that it can be analyzed further.
Regards,
To
y
to browse the messages.
On 5.3 I personally could not give you the assurance you are asking for.
Best Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Mike L. wrote:
>
> Torsten:
>
> Thank you for your reply. There are two reasons
slave?
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Mike L. wrote:
>
> All:
>
> I have configured a pure (shared nothing) master/slave setup (both are
> running ActiveMQ 5.3.1).
>
> One o
. jvm heap size increasing over time, the Broker MBean
statistics, destination statistic, number of subscriptions). One of these
should probably indicate if and where there is a problem.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmielke.blogspot.com
.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:18 PM, kureckam wrote:
> I had this message 35 minutes prior to the flood of other messages. But why
> would it take 35 minutes for the other messages to occur after the OOM? We
> use non-durab
Not 100%ly sure but did the cursor run out of memory and perhaps even temp
space because of too many messages and slow subscribers? You may want to check
JMX statistics of the broker and the topic in question if it hits any limits.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie
Its most certainly something external that tells the broker to shutdown.
Are you sure no other users have a script running that would send a TERM signal
to the broker?
If you're running on Linux, is it possible that the OOM killer kicks in?
http://lwn.net/Articles/317814/
Regards,
To
.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Oct 28, 2012, at 1:12 AM, sub3 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a thread trying to send to a topic, which is caught in a
> 'waitForSpace' function. I am only using memory, no disk and I believe I
> have
> AFAIR there is a reloadLog4jProperties() JMX operation in the Broker MBean.
> Could you test and confirm?
Yes, that one works as expected. I have tested it various times.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
&
> prevent this from happening,that is configure the size of parameter
> durableTopicPrefetch and maxPageSize in PolicyEntry. I wonder if there's
> another way to do this.
I presume bigger JVM heap size should help as well as a lower prefetch for
durable topic subscriber.
R
There are a couple of unit tests that setup the same.
Perhaps have a look in activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/network
package for example code.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Oct 22, 2012, at 11:03 PM, newUser06 wrote:
> Hi,
>
want to rely on this?
Finally you could also consider a master slave broker configuration to make
your JMS broker highly available.
Hope this helps as a starting point.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
aware of any changes in this regards. Have you double checked in JMX
(e.g. jconsole) that there is a consumer registered on the queue that the
Tomcat app writes the ack message to?
Can you browse the ack message using jconsole?
Any additional logging in the brokers log file that would indicate a pr
d information on network connector configuration for this
deployment scenario in
http://tmielke.blogspot.de/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html
Hope this helps.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
-persistent msgs to disk, into the tmp area.
These files would definitely get deleted after a broker restart but from what I
know should also get deleted once the messages got all consumed.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Sep 10, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Oleg
Hello Oleg,
Have a read over
http://activemq.apache.org/why-do-kahadb-log-files-remain-after-cleanup.html
and perhaps try the suggested logging configuration. It should help you to
figure out why journal files aren't getting deleted.
Hope this helps,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesourc
On the total time spent for the garbage collector, this is not the time spent
when the garbage collector was run the last time, its the total time spent on
garbage collection since the JVM has been started.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Sep 7, 2012
Perhaps you could attach your broker configuration for verification.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 31, 2012, at 4:30 PM, gdulus wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have problem with ActiveMQ and JdbcMessageIdRepository - AMQ don't wan't
>
.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 30, 2012, at 11:49 AM, gaurav.seth wrote:
> What all messages land in ActiveMQ.DLQ and what all in Individual dead letter
> queues. What configuration we need to do in activemq.xml file to do that? I
> have
ActiveMQ.Advisory.MessageDLQd.Queue and ActiveMQ.Advisory.MessageDLQd.Topic
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 30, 2012, at 7:18 PM, gaurav.seth wrote:
> Is there any way to log messages that got trapped in DLQ in logs? How I can
> be notified when a message get stored in DLQ, do I n
you tell me how to graph and
>> chart the gerenated test results?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Torsten Mielke-2 [via ActiveMQ] <
>> ml-node+s2283324n4655754...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This page that
On Aug 30, 2012, at 12:45 AM, mikmela wrote:
> I'd like to get e-mail notifications when jira gets updated? Looks like just
> registering in issue's Watch List is not enough...
>
That should be enough, assuming you have an Apache account with an email
address registered.
://github.com/chirino/jms-benchmark
Hope this helps.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 29, 2012, at 5:54 AM, rmn190 wrote:
>
> I want to run the benchmark test, and the activemq version is 5.6.0.
>
> And I follow the steps
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.
may also want to configure for CACHE_CONSUMER cache level in the
DefaultMessageListenerContainer, although I don't see how this would impact
your current error.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 25, 2012, at 3:47 AM, paul.dark wrote:
> Hi,guy
Any chance you could verify that this particular subscriber is not subscribing
and unsubscribing all the time, causing it to get registered/unregistered very
quickly?
5.4.2 is fairly old, I would highly recommend to upgrade to the latest version
some time soon.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors
f the overall
applications underlying infrastructure and needs to be highly available at any
time. In such requirement its better to run standalone brokers, perhaps
configured for high availability.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 23, 2012, at 12:
What version of ActiveMQ is your user using? If its any later version, i.e.
5.5.0 or higher, I suggest switching to KahaDB as the persistence adapter.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 21, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Jamie wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
>
If you're starting with ActiveMQ, do you really want to use such an old version?
I highly encourage you to upgrade to the latest 5.6 version if that is
possible.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Sri wrote:
> Hi ,
>
&
r help, I will try that and advise of the results.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Torsten Mielke [mailto:tors...@fusesource.com]
> Sent: 21 August 2012 03:25 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ hangs
>
> What version of ActiveMQ are you
ions if you want the broker to store these messages.
Things are different with queue messages. They are kept by the broker by
default when there are no consumers connected.
Best Regards,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
m the
persistence adapter when its time to dispatch them. Persistent queue messages
get written to kahadb right when being received by the broker.
Regards,
Torsten Mielke
On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Tlholoe, Peter wrote:
> Hi,
> I am currently monitoring all the queues/ topics at the mom
console or JMX.
Also, a thread dump of the broker and the Camel route (in case it runs external
to the broker) could help you to find out in what state the broker and your
Camel route are.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 21, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Tlholoe
You can use any file system that supports proper file locking, e.g. NFSv4 or
GFS.
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
Hope this helps,
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On Aug 19, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Eugene Brian Ong wrote:
> Hi,
>
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
