On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:38 AM, antlet wrote: > thanks! > OK, maybe I should give up the pure Master/Slave, then which way you > recommond ? I think jdbc + mysql is not a good Idea, it increase my > system's complexity ,and I dont think the reliability of mysql is better > than activeMQ, and it make the system a extra single-point
Both alternatives are fine, hardened, tested and deployed in a good number of environments. You can go either way: jdbc master/slave or shared file system master/slave. Torsten Mielke tors...@fusesource.com tmielke.blogspot.com
