Re: abortSlowConsumerStrategy pre-ActiveMQ Classic 5.9

en reports: “KahaDB is version 7”. Everything seems to > work from the small test that I did. > > Regards, > > William Crowell > > From: Matt Pavlovich > Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 at 7:53 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: abortSlowConsumerS

Re: abortSlowConsumerStrategy pre-ActiveMQ Classic 5.9

That would be one issue. > > Thanks, > > William Crowell > > From: Matt Pavlovich > Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 at 4:59 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: abortSlowConsumerStrategy pre-ActiveMQ Classic 5.9 > There are a _ton_ of changes up to v5.9.

Re: abortSlowConsumerStrategy pre-ActiveMQ Classic 5.9

There are a _ton_ of changes up to v5.9.x. I think it would be more work than upgrading to get that feature back ported. What is preventing an upgrade? The broker supports multiple openwire versions pretty well, should be able to update the broker without forcing clients to upgrade. Matt

Re: What changed between ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.6 and 6.1.7 where the images do not show up on the web user interface?

There is no re-release. There would be a v6.1.8 release with the fix. I don’t have time to tackle it right now, but we should add a note to the download page to the doc and note with the fix to the config file to get users of v6.1.7 unblocked. Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 9, 2025, at 6:35

Re: What changed between ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.6 and 6.1.7 where the images do not show up on the web user interface?

Hi Sergio- Thank you for monitoring the list and providing the fix. Are you able to make another PR for this fix? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 3, 2025, at 1:14 PM, Sérgio Damo de Lemos > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I was the author of the change in the Web Console.

Re: [EXT] ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 - Clustering

Hi Rohini- No, the camel-wmq component is essentially just the proprietary IBM MQ ‘MQI’ protocol vs using JMS. The use case for it is very narrow over using camel-jms for IBM MQ. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 18, 2025, at 7:26 AM, Bethapudi, Rohini Kumar (TR Technology) >

Re: [EXT] ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 - Clustering

Hi Rohini- That is correct, Apache ActiveMQ and Camel do not have an option for integrating directly with IBM MQ clusters. I suggest you check out the third-party support providers. I know there are options available to do exactly what you are looking for. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Ju

Re: ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 - Clustering

(better for running cloud/Kubernetes where you may want to scale your cluster). These two approaches can also be combined to support really cool topologies =) Migration is usually very straight forward! Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 3, 2025, at 4:17 AM, Bethapudi, Rohini Kumar (TR Technol

Re: Linux Specific Tuning For Apache Artemis

handles. Any enterprise-grade has already tweaked that setting, but some personal-use or free distros will default the number of file handle limits to 1000 or 1024 and that is too low for most message brokers or databases. Matt Pavlovich > On May 27, 2025, at 11:18 AM, William Crowell >

Re: Apache ActiveMQ Classic Idempotency Using Apache Cassandra

subscribers to the same message flow. Hope this helps, Matt Pavlovich > On May 27, 2025, at 12:04 PM, Jason Jackson > wrote: > > I am using Cassandra in place of the local file, in-memory, etc, that is > built into ActiveMQ for Idempotentcy. > > ActiveMQ Classic is bein

Re: ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.x OCSP Settings and java.security File

implementation wired into the JDK. Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 29, 2025, at 11:43 AM, Jason Jackson > wrote: > > Quick question > > For the java.security file and the OCSP settings that are available within > ActiveMQ, does the file allow for multiple OCSP servers via multiple lin

Re: Better understanding performance tuning

Hi Raymond- Others have reported similar results when comparing Artemis and Classic recently. For ActiveMQ Classic, the out-of-the-box settings are designed to handle all sorts of scenarios, but it is definitely not tuned for performance.. I suspect you can increase your ActiveMQ Classic num

Re: Better understanding performance tuning

Hi Raymond- One other thing I meant to mention— if you have a pure performance use case, at some point Apache Camel becomes the bottleneck, and you may need to consider converting those routes to pure Java. Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 2, 2025, at 10:27 AM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > > H

Re: Maximum Amount of Topic/Queues Within Apache Artemis

I’d love to see the bill for storing metrics and logs for 1mm topics or hundreds of millions of topics. That sounds more like a splash blog post vs a practical solution. > On Mar 8, 2025, at 1:06 PM, Nathan Clayton > wrote: > > I'm not sure about Kafka, but Apache Pulsar is currently built t

Re: Maximum Amount of Topic/Queues Within Apache Artemis

message filter EIP as a layer on top to separate and filter messages without having to have millions of queues. Hope this helps! Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 5, 2025, at 12:30 PM, William Crowell > wrote: > > Good afternoon, > > Are there any limitations or concerns with

Re: ActiveMQ 6.1.5 Performance Tuning Issue

you are seeing. - Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 27, 2025, at 9:39 AM, William Crowell > wrote: > > Disclaimer before reading this: This is a tuning issue and not a performance > problem with ActiveMQ. > > > > Description of the issue: > > > > I believ

Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?

ide from wide variation in the workloads there is also wide variation >>> in >>>> performance goals. Some folks don't mind a heavy workload with relatively >>>> high latency. Some folks want the heaviest possible workload with the >>>> lowest possible la

Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?

support for OpenWire. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 19, 2025, at 10:02 AM, William Crowell > wrote: > > Justin, > > It would be OpenWire. > > Regards, > > William Crowell > > From: Justin Bertram > Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 at 10:56 AM > To

Re: Are there any hardware recommendations for ActiveMQ Classic?

on a Raspberry Pi or scale up to very large heaps on a single broker. That being said— the faster the disk you can get, the faster the messages will be processed! -Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 19, 2025, at 5:33 AM, William Crowell > wrote: > > Hi, > > Are there any hardware re

Re: ActiveMQ Classic / Unordered message delivery / JIRA AMQ-9653

instance of a single _producer_ and not any wider scope. Queues can be multi-threaded, so there is no order guaranteed across multiple producers. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 11, 2025, at 6:31 AM, Ephemeris Lappis > wrote: > > Hello ! > > I'm a bit embarrassed: I reporte

Re: Reconnected producers not handled correctly

Hi Greg- A review of the activemq configuration files and logs would be needed to get a full picture. From your description, it sounds like you are using a ‘failover’ uri for the brokerA to brokerB communication. That is a common misconfiguration. Network Connectors automatically reconnect, so

Re: Thread leak/ memory leak in active mq classic instance(v 5.18.3)

allowing re-use of the port. You may just be topping out the OS configured limit and need to scale horizontally or add more IPs for clients to access. Please share the full thread dump. The partial provided thread dump is missing the other half of the blocked lock attempt. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich >

Re: AMQ Classic 5.18.x JAKARTA RAR (remote only)?

Yes, this is all referring to OpenWire (which is the only protocol impacted by the Jakarta API changes.) Matt Pavlovich- > On Dec 10, 2024, at 10:15 AM, Fred Welland wrote: > > Thanks actually! > > That may just be good enough. > > Was trending that way (6.x client

Re: AMQ Classic 5.18.x JAKARTA RAR (remote only)?

committed to making sure it works, if you find anything report it and we’ll fix it. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich ActiveMQ PMC > On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Fred Welland wrote: > > Yeah I know -- tested that a few ways (and mentioned that in my post). > > But is it endorsed or reco

Re: AMQ Classic 5.18.x JAKARTA RAR (remote only)?

Hi Fred- The 6.x client jar can work with to 5.x brokers. Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 10, 2024, at 8:56 AM, Fred Welland wrote: > > Subject summarizes my question: I can not seem to find an RAR artifact > that is 'ok' for a remote AMQ broker 5.17x/5.18x but is suitab

Re: Support requesting to config SLDAP for ActiveMQ

> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 04:14, Matt Pavlovich <mailto:mattr...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi Ravindu- >> >> What is the exception message in the log? >> >> Note: LDAP/LDAPS support is provided by the Java JDK and not any additional >> 3rd pa

Re: Support requesting to config SLDAP for ActiveMQ

Hi Ravindu- What is the exception message in the log? Note: LDAP/LDAPS support is provided by the Java JDK and not any additional 3rd party dependencies. Thanks, Matt > On Dec 3, 2024, at 8:50 AM, Ravindu Wanasinghe > wrote: > > +MIT.MS > > Hi justin, > > Than

Re: Looking for support in ActiveMQ 6.1.2

information and share in the ActiveMQ Slack channel, or consider reaching out to ActiveMQ support organizations found here: https://activemq.apache.org/support Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 14, 2024, at 6:51 AM, Dipanwita Barik > wrote: > > Hi users, > > I need

Re: How to upgrade my ActiveMQ Classic Broker 5.17.3 to 5.18.6 (Windows)

Hi Paul- I recently replied to a couple users asking for similar recommendation on how to do upgrade — upgrade in place vs install side-by-side and drain, etc. Review the list archives and you should find a couple emails with instructions on upgrade options. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On No

Re: ActiveMQ Classic Broker and Client Module Issue

shaded jar that solves it, I’d be up for integrating into the Apache tree. Note: another one to look at would be the activemq-all jar. It may be really close to what you are needing. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 18, 2024, at 2:11 PM, Freeman, Christopher > wrote: > > It looks l

Re: SSL verification check

ertificate-hostname-verification-in-java-ldap-j Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 21, 2024, at 3:53 AM, John, Richard apgemini.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Good morning. > > Is it possible to disable SSL certificate verification checks (just for test > purposes) - specifically

Re: Warning, Transport ... failed, not attempting to automatically reconnect?

) in your broker configuration file. If that option is not present, please share a redacted version of your configuration file to this email thread. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 21, 2024, at 10:19 AM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > > Hi- > > This error looks to be caused by zero b

Re: Warning, Transport ... failed, not attempting to automatically reconnect?

broker port? These tools would make a connection and not send any data across, which could lead to this scenario. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 21, 2024, at 5:22 AM, rop wrote: > > We are running an application using ActiveMQ (currently, version 5.18.3) > with multiple queues a

Re: VirtualSelectorCacheBrokerPlugin - expiration of selectors ?

active the entire time it is registered with the broker up until a new selector is provided by a new consumer— in your example, that would be step #3 when the second selector would become active and the first selector is deactivated. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 21, 2024, at 4:58 AM, CAS

Re: How to upgrade ActiveMQ classic 5.13.x to 5.17.x ?

Hi Samuel- The ActiveMQ command line has a couple of tools to that can give you those numbers.. Table of queue (aka destination) stats: ./bin/activemq dstat List of broker metrics: ./bin/activemq bstat Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 18, 2024, at 3:04 AM, Samuel VISCAPI wrote: >

Re: ActiveMQ Classic Broker and Client Module Issue

need to wait until the next major release — 7.x. Tip— the OSGi module is a single jar with everything packaged, you may look to try that dependency, or rolling your own shaded jar with everything you need in one place. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 15, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Freeman, Christop

Re: How to upgrade ActiveMQ classic 5.13.x to 5.17.x ?

from 5.13.x to 5.17.x #1 and #2 are generally the better options. #3 can get tricky if you do advanced stuff like scheduling, etc. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 11, 2024, at 3:46 AM, SAMUEL VISCAPI > wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have to upgrade ActiveMQ classic for on

Re: Bridging Artemis with classic

? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 4, 2024, at 11:07 PM, Justin Bertram wrote: > > Development on Classic has slowed considerably since focus has shifted to > Artemis. Most of the folks who've contributed the most code to Classic > historically have either left the project or m

Re: ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.1 Broker Name not updated in Web Console Network Bridge Tab after failover of Remote Broker

Hi Arthur- Yes, you would nest the two nodes for the peer primary and failover hosts. For the primary1 and failover1 nodes you would do: uri="masterslave:(tcp://primary2:61616, tcp://failover2:61616)..." Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 30, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Arthur Rodriguez wrote:

Re: ActiveMQ LDAP Query objectClass Issue

your own as that is not a standard configuration. Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 26, 2024, at 11:17 AM, Jason Jackson > wrote: > > I read through the link and several other Apache ideas and none of these > appear to address the issue. > > I am using JAAS LDAP Authenti

Re: ActiveMQ LDAP Query objectClass Issue

Also— this document shows how to limit the queries and get rid of objectClass=* style queries: https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/security Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 25, 2024, at 5:01 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > > Hi Jason- > > Sounds lik

Re: ActiveMQ LDAP Query objectClass Issue

Hi Jason- Sounds like you have some misconfiguration — either clients are connecting and sending one-message-per-connection, and/or you should add LDAP Connection Pooling settings. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 25, 2024, at 3:45 PM, Jason Jackson > wrote: > > I have Acti

Re: ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.1 Broker Name not updated in Web Console Network Bridge Tab after failover of Remote Broker

t there is a known solution. > > Thanks, > Arthur Rodriguez > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 1:03 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote: > >> Hi Arthur- >> >> Would you please try this without using failover? Network Connectors >> reconnect by default, so you should not use the fail

Re: ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.1 Broker Name not updated in Web Console Network Bridge Tab after failover of Remote Broker

. https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/networks-of-brokers#NetworksofBrokers-MasterSlaveDiscovery Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 19, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Arthur Rodriguez wrote: > > We are running ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.1 in a Shared File System Master Slave > HA

Re: ActiveMQ Idempotentcy with Apache Cassandra

and outbox patterns. When these are implemented, you are able to safely relax guarantees at the ActiveMQ layer and achieve insanely high throughput. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Aug 29, 2024, at 7:06 AM, Jason Jackson > wrote: > > I have run into an issue where I am occasional

Re: ActiveMQ 5.18.4, seeing wrong 'inflight' count

Hi Martin- Can you create a reproducible test case? If so, we can apply a fix. If numbers are going negative, that would seem to indicate some sort of consumer mishandling. For example-- messages being rollback or the consumer being closed before consuming all messages in prefetch (ie. Use Sp

Re: Erroneous Duplicate Suppression

Hi Ben- I suggest you open a ticket with AWS. The Apache community does not have visibility to their build to know what patches or changes have been applied to their build. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Aug 4, 2024, at 8:21 PM, Ben D'Herville > wrote: > > We have been ex

Re: ActiveMQ Classic Windows (5.16.3) Restart Super Slow (4 hours)

Hi Mike- No, that is abnormal. Is the disk locally attached or a volume (SAN, NAS, etc)? Review the ActiveMQ logs for targeted messages related to disk corruption, etc. -Matt > On Jul 19, 2024, at 7:23 AM, Mike Prest > wrote: > > We're running ActiveMQ Classic Windows (5.16.3) and every time

Re: Test message api looks to be broken in ActiveMQ 5.18.4

quot;; ref: https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/documentation/rest Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 15, 2024, at 1:12 PM, Mau, I-Min > wrote: > > Hi, we recently tried out ActiveMQ 5.18.4 (we were at 5.16.7) and one thing > we encountered is that the test message api seems to be broken

Re: Best practices on queue purging using activemq classic with kahadb

cloud-based storage. If you do identify an ActiveMQ coding problem that could be optimized, I’d be happy to review it for adoption. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 1, 2024, at 5:26 PM, Ritesh Adval > wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Pinging again on below query to check

Re: ActiveMQ "classic" (5.18.3) / Unexpected line feed at the end of message

, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 19, 2024, at 8:01 AM, Ephemeris Lappis > wrote: > > Hello. > > After looking at the binary value in the database field, I can see > that the 0x0A is present at the end of the message. > > I've also tested sending the same payload using

Re: Why not embed Jetty 10 with Active MQ 5.18.x

12. If users need Jakarta support (ie. Jetty 11), they should be using ActiveMQ 6.x. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:59 PM, Mau, I-Min > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am a bit surprised when another colleague pointed out to me that on > https://activemq.apache.o

Re: Upgrade Java 8 for ActiveMQ 5.15

latest). Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 9, 2024, at 10:52 PM, NORDIN Hishamudin > wrote: > > Hi Support, > > We are plan to upgrade Java8 latest version 411 on ActiveMQ 5.15. Is there > any special steps/handling on to do this? > > > Best Regar

Re: Asynchronous Send Acknowledgements

-side app to happen once per message. If you commit every 100 (or best for your messages size) you will see very fast throughput. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 5, 2024, at 2:33 AM, s.go...@inform-technology.de wrote: > > I have a question concerning Asynchronous Send Acknowledgements.

Re: Compatibility ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.x resource adapter and client with 6.x broker

Correct. > On Jun 4, 2024, at 7:37 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Hi Robbie, > > thanks, that was the one I remembered. > > So if I understand this correctly, we could "mix and match" as we want to and > don't have to be afraid of compatibility issues between 5.18.x (a least > 5.18.4) clie

Re: Update of Spring planned for ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.5?

. Spring has a massive OSS-based user community. -Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 3, 2024, at 10:18 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > Thanks - but it would seem that Spring really EOLs Spring 5 in 08/2024 and > will provide updates only for paying customers... > So

Re: Update of Spring planned for ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.5?

some "automatism")! >> >> And just between the two of us: I was the one asking for this EOL >> topic some time ago because we're stuck with Solaris on Sparc where >> Java 17 is not supported... currently it looks like our way forward >> will be to migra

Re: Update of Spring planned for ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.5?

Hi Stefan- Currently, the work is on a 6.2.0 release and a 5.18.x will usually come around the same time. Dependencies (including Spring) are updated ahead of each release. Keep in mind Spring is planning to EOL OSS support in August of 2024. I recommend starting to make plans for ActiveMQ 6.

Re: ActiveMQ Classic SSL/TLS Support

, Matt Pavlovich > On May 28, 2024, at 8:36 AM, Daniel Raj wrote: > > Hi team > > I could find some details about how to configure ssl but not quite sure if > ActiveMQ Classic supports TLS1.2 & TLS1.3. > > Appreciate if someone could confirm this

Re: Log JMS headers

Hi Peter- Are you trying to log on the client side or server-side? For the broker-side, there is a LoggingBrokerPlugin that will log the JMS properties and headers for each message. For the client-side, that is usually application-specific. Some frameworks have built-in support to log message

Re: Setting up a network of brokers: queues not syncing

Hi Marc- Yep, that approach sounds on target. The async-replication is a successful approach to avoid the side-effects with sync-based replication in messaging systems. -Matt > On May 22, 2024, at 5:43 PM, Marc Boorshtein wrote: > > Thanks Matt for the explanation. We have two scenarios we

Re: Setting up a network of brokers: queues not syncing

unplanned outages that require taking the entire cluster down to resend. Large ActiveMQ clusters often see better overall cluster uptime using VM volumes, Kubernetes Volumes and infrastructure-level HA components vs trying to replicate at the message broker layer. Best, Matt Pavlovich > On May

Re: When is a message dropped from memory on a topic?

Just to clarify, the PendingMessageLimitStrategy applies to Classic, but > the question was about Artemis. > > > Justin > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:41 AM Matt Pavlovich wrote: > >> .. or when the PendingMessageLimitStrategy is applied messages may be >> dropped based on d

Re: When is a message dropped from memory on a topic?

.. or when the PendingMessageLimitStrategy is applied messages may be dropped based on desired message pattern. > On May 21, 2024, at 10:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > If you don't have any subscribers on the topic, the message is directly > removed. > > If you have subscribe

Re: Need help in upgrading activemq

This looks like a problem with slf4j logging library compatibility. -Matt > On May 13, 2024, at 11:20 PM, Sowjanya wrote: > > Hi > > We are trying to upgrade from activemq 5.11.2 to 5.12.0, New version of > activemq is being reflected but unfortunately not able to access any module > in our a

Re: Security filters

filtered to _separate_ queues and permissions handled there vs trying to sub-divide a single shared queue. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On May 10, 2024, at 8:47 AM, Daniel Martín Anido > wrote: > > Hi there! > > I'm trying to let external users access my broker. Messag

Re: I can’t get activemq 5 to run with Spring 5

, activemq-broker, etc. I sent you a Slack invite. -Matt Pavlovich > On May 8, 2024, at 4:19 AM, Jonas Jansson wrote: > > Hi folks, i desperately need som guidance as to how to get my ActiveMQ > upgrade to work with Tomcat and Spring5. > (If Slack is better, happy to ge

Re: can you please send me an invite link to join the ActiveMQ Slack channel

Invitation request submitted -Matt Pavlovich > On May 7, 2024, at 2:17 PM, Tim Jones wrote: > > Hi, > > can you please send me an invite link to join the ActiveMQ Slack channel. > > > Thanks > > Tim

Re: Unable to configure SSL and authentication

log messages? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On May 7, 2024, at 2:07 AM, Naveen Kumar wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm using Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.16.7 version. My requirement is to > enable SSL and authentication for the JMX URL to prevent from RMI. > > I have generate

Re: Why the option for createConnector?

Hi Douglas- Yeah, it is outdated. Definitely a candidate for deprecation-for-removal in ActiveMQ 7.x Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 29, 2024, at 11:37 AM, Doug Whitfield > wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I am reading the JMX documentation at > https://activemq.apache.o

Re: ActiveMQ Classic Broker Stuck in Recovery

reproduce it in a unit test or get a specific error message, we’d be able to give it a shot. If your organization really needs a root cause — checkout out the commercial support options. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 26, 2024, at 3:19 PM, Derek Zhang wrote: > > Thanks Justin, >

Re: ActiveMQ Classic v6.x - Encrypted passwords for web-based services

and service management (even though > authZ can make sure some users only can access the service and some users can > only access the management). > > > BR, > > - Simon > > ____ > From: Matt Pavlovich > Sent: 16 April 2024 05:06

Re: ActiveMQ Classic v6.x - Encrypted passwords for web-based services

Note — This also falls under one of the goals for ActiveMQ 7.x’s non-Spring bootstrapping to support single JAAS-provider for all services, that uses broker-wide crypto and config services to handle encrypted macro expansion across authn/authz and config params. > On Apr 13, 2024, at 11:49 PM,

Re: ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.4

Hi Stefan- The 5.18.4 release is “in-progress”, so it should update on website and Maven Central shortly. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 11, 2024, at 1:11 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Dear ActiveMQ committers, > > One question regarding 5.18.4: has this bee

Re: activemq-6.1.0 missing observation

Camel side confidently knowing the broker part is good. Camel has its own error handling, and you may need to turn on debugging to see if Camel’s error handler is discarding the message. Ref: https://activemq.apache.org/logging-interceptor Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 27, 2024, at 10:41

Re: Is there an ASF Jira link or other place where I can find a release ETA for ActiveMQ 6.0.2 and other versions ?

Hi James- ActiveMQ 6.1.1 is currently in the process of being released and includes Spring 6.1.5. There is no formal schedule published ahead of releases. JIRA tracks the planned issues for each release, and is the best place to track upcoming releases. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar

Re: Future of ActiveMQ 5.x with nearing EOL of Spring 5.3.x

5.x will stay on Spring 5. This is all community support, so it is best effort. If you need formalized support, checkout the commercial offerings: https://activemq.apache.org/support Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 25, 2024, at 10:45 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Dear ActiveM

Re: ActiveMQ 5 read queue issues

aligned properly before looking further at any other issues. Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 20, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Frédéric Curvat wrote: > > Hello, > > Here is a poc : https://github.com/fcurvat/amqpoc > > Just start an activemq broker (5.18.3) run the class 'PocAmq

Re: ActiveMQ 5 read queue issues

Hi Frédéric- Do you have a small sample project that is able to reproduce the issue that you can share (preferably a simple GitHub project)? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 19, 2024, at 10:47 AM, Frédéric Curvat wrote: > > Hello, > > Checking back on the case, i played w

Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.0 has been released!

ure to have in 6.x and 5.x clients: - Mapping javax / jakarta exception in openwire protocol I’d love to get more feedback from users, such as yourself, on real world scenarios. Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 17, 2024, at 5:58 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote: > > Hi! > Thanks for the rele

Re: ActiveMQ 5 read queue issues

Hi Fred- Most likely, you are seeing a _redelivery_ vs a bug or actual duplicate message. First thing to confirm that it is in fact the same message by comparing messageId, and not just properties or message body content. There are scenarios where a producer may inadvertently send the same me

Re: Issue with network of brokers and active/passive pair

her non-intuitive options that must be configured for > it to work as desired > > For my own edification, is there any explanation anywhere of the differences > between failover and masterslave? I’d be curious to understand how it works. > > Thanks again. > > >

Re: Queue Retrieval Performance after upgrade

Hi Steve- These settings are lower than the default and generally lead to degraded consumer performance. Any reason you lowered the maxPageSize from 200 to 10? What only allow 1 message prefetch— the default is 1,000? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jan 23, 2024, at 9:58 AM, Steve Hill wr

Re: ActiveMQ 6.0.1 Upgrade from 5.18..3 and JMX Settings

/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java#L699 Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jan 31, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Jason Jackson > wrote: > > I am working on upgrading ActiveMQ from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1. > > For all previous 5.x version I have set the following JMX settings and there >

Re: Apache Log4j 1.x Multiple Vulnerabilities--Apache ActiveMQ classic version upgrade

This looks like you are referencing a log handler that is not shipped as part of the Apache ActiveMQ distribution. Possibly a Fuse or Red Hat A-MQ build? That part of the ActiveMQ configuration needs to be removed and/or modified. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 1, 2024, at 5:03 PM, Vis

Re: Stomp configuration questions

Hi Paul- Yes, log4j2 has a completely different log config file format vs log4j v1. The only docs / blog posts / etc haven’t caught up. If you can share the log sample you are trying (and/or link to ActiveMQ webpage), we can try to get you a log4j2 version. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb

Re: Issue with network of brokers and active/passive pair

/documentation/networks-of-brokers Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 22, 2024, at 8:20 PM, Bruce Cooper wrote: > > "static:failover:

Re: AcitveMQ 6.0.1 and Spring Framework CVE-2024-22243

console which eliminates usage of the spring-web dependency. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 26, 2024, at 5:24 PM, James Velasco > wrote: > > Apparently ActiveMQ 6.0.1 uses spring-web v6.0.14 which is impacted by > CVE-2024-22243. > > See https://spring.io/security

Re: Upgrade to Spring 5.3.32 for ActiveMQ 5.18.4 because of CVE-2024-22243?

he web console which eliminates usage of the spring-web dependency. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 27, 2024, at 12:49 AM, Boeltl, Stefan > wrote: > > Hi, > > We're getting security findings regarding CVE-2024-22243 when scanning > ActiveMQ 5.18.3. > Didn't want

Re: Message delivery failure and Primary Key violation on load balanced ActiveMQ Broker

Hi Jack- This looks like you are using the JDBC backend. I would recommend having the DBA review logs for the database for other indicators. You may have a couple things going on. For sure it appears you have a duplicate publishing attempt based on the PRIMARY KEY violation. -Matt Pavlovich

Re: Messages stuck in schedule queue on ActiveMQ 5.16.3

traces from a log, that can lead to a resolution. Best to first rule out any configuration or coding error by the application. Hope this helps. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 14, 2023, at 11:28 AM, Doug Whitfield > wrote: > > Is there any information we could provide to help find

Re: lock file modification issue in Master/Slave mode with Shared file locker

Kubernetes Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 5, 2023, at 3:05 PM, HOUNGBE, Fabrice (MTL) > wrote: > > Hi, > We have a Master/Slave config with Classic ActiveMQ flavor. Our 2 servers > share the same KahaDB (NFS/SMB). > Since we upgrade the OS from windows server 2016 t

Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6

> class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean"> This is a really out-dated javadoc reference. I’ll look into how we can update it going forward. Essentially, it is an out-dated in-line example of creating a pooledConnectionFactory. Please use the more current examples from activemq-pool/activemq-jms-pool Tha

Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6

ServletException: Handler dispatch failed: >>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class >>> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the >>> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory >>> >>> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 co

Re: Xbean with ActiveMQ Classic 6

Hi Raymond- There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory. I suspect a classpath issue. If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to look at it this week. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n wrote: > > I'm currentl

Re: ActiveMQ classic - no persistence but need lease-database-locker

message flow. Also— for non-persistent HA with two or more brokers, you can use priority url’s to maintain ordering, instead of using a lease locker. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 29, 2023, at 2:19 AM, Martin Lichtin wrote: > > I'd like to configure ActiveMQ classic for non-persis

Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 has been released!

Hell Frank- 1. Yes, the client-libraries (in the most common use case of remote client-server mode) are compatible between 5.18.x and 6.0.x and vice-versa. 2. Yes, 5.18.x is still being maintained and updated— at least for now. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 27, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Rac

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

identify anything we need to update we’ll tackle it. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 22, 2023, at 2:22 PM, Calle Andersson > wrote: > > Hi, > > Many unexpected things occured today but I managed to perform a very quick > test. > > I replaced the ra.xml only sin

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

/b90e54be0105d1fa2641b933298b916ed9b9750b/activemq-rar/src/main/rar/META-INF/ra.xml If you use the embedded broker, also update this file: https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/b90e54be0105d1fa2641b933298b916ed9b9750b/activemq-rar/src/main/rar/broker-config.xml Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 21, 2023, at 10:37 AM, M

Re: Resource adapter for Jakarta EE 10 servers

JIRA created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9398 > On Nov 21, 2023, at 4:56 AM, Calle Andersson > wrote: > > I did a simple test by placing the files in the deployments directory on a > Wildfly 28 server (since that is how the resource adapter is deployed on my > older Wildfly se

  1   2   3   4   >