Glad to hear =)
> On Dec 5, 2023, at 9:58 AM, ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Short update on the upgrade to AMQ 6. After checking the dependency tree
> with Gradle I found out that ActiveMQ was downgraded to 5.18.3. I changed
> that and now it works fine.Thnx
>
> Raymond
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:04 AM ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And does there is also a new version of the activemq.xsd schema?
>>
>> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/
>>
>> Can't find a 6.0 compatible one. The old one has also for example:
>>
>> <bean id="pooledConnectionFactory"
>> class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean">
>>
>> The trouble is some libs were changed from javax to jakarta, but some
>> stayed the same as they are not related to the Jakarta project as managed
>> by the Eclipse foundation.
>>
>> Raymond
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:50 AM ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think you are right. I for example, thought I updated all dependencies
>>> to Jakarta, but still got:
>>>
>>> jakarta.servlet.ServletException: Handler dispatch failed:
>>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class
>>> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the
>>> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory
>>>
>>> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 completely use jakarta or
>>> does it still uses javax for some stuff?
>>>
>>> Raymond
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Raymond-
>>>>
>>>> There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect a classpath issue.
>>>>
>>>> If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to
>>>> look at it this week.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
>>>>>
>>>>> Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
>>>>>
>>>>> My code is like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> //get the path of activemq.xml file
>>>>> String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
>>>>>
>>>>> //create the xbean broker uri
>>>>> String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
>>>>> UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
>>>>>
>>>>> //create the broker with the xbean uri
>>>>> URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
>>>>> broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I however get a classnotfoundexception:
>>>>>
>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>> org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
>>>>> at
>>>> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only
>>>> after
>>>>> adding this dependency:
>>>>>
>>>>> <!--
>>>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
>>>>> -->
>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
>>>>> <version>6.0.1</version>
>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>
>>>>> The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been
>>>> a
>>>>> change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
>>>>>
>>>>> Raymond
>>>>
>>>>
