> On Dec 5, 2023, at 3:04 AM, ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/
I’ve contacted the committer who did the release, and he will finish pushing
the XSDs out. You should see new schemas up shortly.
> <bean id="pooledConnectionFactory"
> class="javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.PooledConnectionFactoryFactoryBean">
This is a really out-dated javadoc reference. I’ll look into how we can update
it going forward. Essentially, it is an out-dated in-line example of creating a
pooledConnectionFactory.
Please use the more current examples from activemq-pool/activemq-jms-pool
Thanks!
Matt Pavlovich
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:50 AM ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you are right. I for example, thought I updated all dependencies
>> to Jakarta, but still got:
>>
>> jakarta.servlet.ServletException: Handler dispatch failed:
>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Class
>> org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory does not implement the
>> requested interface jakarta.jms.ConnectionFactory
>>
>> Need to run a dependency tree. Does ActiveMQ 6 completely use jakarta or
>> does it still uses javax for some stuff?
>>
>> Raymond
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raymond-
>>>
>>> There are a ton of unit tests that use the xbean factory.
>>>
>>> I suspect a classpath issue.
>>>
>>> If you can share a simplified code project via GitHub, I’d be happy to
>>> look at it this week.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>>
>>>> On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:16 PM, ski n <raymondmees...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently upgrading to the new ActiveMQ 6 (from 5.18.3 to 6.0.1).
>>>>
>>>> I'm starting an embedded with the help of xbean:
>>>>
>>>> https://activemq.apache.org/broker-xbean-uri
>>>>
>>>> Using the " xbean:file:filePathResource ".
>>>>
>>>> My code is like this:
>>>>
>>>> //get the path of activemq.xml file
>>>> String brokerPath = brokerFile.getCanonicalPath();
>>>>
>>>> //create the xbean broker uri
>>>> String brokerUrl = "xbean:file:" +
>>>> UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(brokerPath);
>>>>
>>>> //create the broker with the xbean uri
>>>> URI configurationUri = new URI(brokerUrl);
>>>> broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(configurationUri);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I however get a classnotfoundexception:
>>>>
>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>> org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
>>>> at
>>> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:526)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.loadClass(FactoryFinder.java:88)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder$StandaloneObjectFactory.create(FactoryFinder.java:61)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.util.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:154)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerFactory.createBrokerFactoryHandler(BrokerFactory.java:41)
>>>>
>>>> I didn't change the dependencies and just updated the version. Only
>>> after
>>>> adding this dependency:
>>>>
>>>> <!--
>>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-spring
>>>> -->
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
>>>> <version>6.0.1</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>>
>>>> The ActiveMQ 6 Classic broker worked. Is this expected? Has there been a
>>>> change on the xbean? Is there an upgrade guide where to look out for?
>>>>
>>>> Raymond
>>>
>>>
