Re: dynamically create transport connector using Spring

to my application via my embedded broker. So I am thinking of create a dynamic list of connectors to allow certain IP address to talk to my app. is it do able and wise to do so? Thanks -Dan bsnyder wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Dan Tran wrote: >> >> >> Act

Re: dynamically create transport connector using Spring

mance/memory issue? My main purpose is just to control security and what host I can listen to. Thanks -Dan rajdavies wrote: > > > On 23 Oct 2009, at 06:32, Dan Tran wrote: > >> >> >> Hi instead of using the bellow config to allow all remote clients to

Re: Please Help: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError after started

Just curious, have you set up your JVM's -Xmx param? -Dan OliverLeeYn wrote: > > Today I install ActiveMQ in a computer , but after AMQ started, the > console post the error: > > INFO BrokerService - ActiveMQ JMS Message Broker (localhost, I > D:oliver-1374-1256219225078-1:0) started > Ex

dynamically create transport connector using Spring

Hi instead of using the bellow config to allow all remote clients to connect to my embedded broker Is there a way to programmatically create transportConnector to allow a limit number of remote client hosts? Thanks -Dan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.co

Re: Expired message - does it work?

scratch that, i need jmsTemplate.setExplicitQosEnabled( true ); as well sorry for the noise. -D Dan Tran wrote: > > > I would like to bring discussion back where I cannot get message in my > queue to expire. > > I am using JmsTemplate producer to send messages to

Re: Expired message - does it work?

no affect Is it the right way? -Dan Dan Tran wrote: > > > It turns out I am using topic and when my consumer is destroyed, all > messages also destroyed, but the stats still lingering in the jconsole and > this is were confusion starts. > > thanks > >

Re: make useJmx's value configurable?

tion. As a workaround you could hack it to make that attribute > a string value. > > 2009/10/9 Dan Tran : >> >> >> Hi I am using ActiveMQ with Spring, and I seem not able to make useJmx >> configurable >> >>   >>  > advisorySupport="false&

make useJmx's value configurable?

Hi I am using ActiveMQ with Spring, and I seem not able to make useJmx configurable I have other properties work fine except that line, any suggestion? must be the xbean's issue? here is error message: SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org

Re: ava.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Failed to fork OS thread - 5.2.0 broker

is to turn off the dedicate task runner: > -Dorg.apache.activemq.UseDedicatedTaskRunner=false. > > Thanks for your help, > -Jimmy > > > Dan Tran wrote: >> >> >> Default flow control can nail you. how big is your message, how fast is >

Re: ava.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Failed to fork OS thread - 5.2.0 broker

; for messages using > > MessageConsumer.receive() > > rather than have the broker push messages to the consumer. Does the > jms.prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch parameter still apply? Perhaps this is > slowing us down? > > -Jimmy > > > Dan Tran wrote: >> >> Sound like you have

Re: ava.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Failed to fork OS thread - 5.2.0 broker

Sound like you have the classical slow consumer fast producer problem. Read up on producer flow control feature, prefetchSize, etc. -Dan jimmymartin wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm running a 5.2.0 broker that throws the error below after about 2 days > of running. I've seen some discussion from pr

Re: Producer flow control not working when there is only one pair

any flow control. I now set prefetch size to a much smaller number ( 10 ), most of messages are stuck in broker, this is where broker can do its job to throttle the producer to slow down. Nothing is better than hand on experience. Sorry for all the noise. -D Mine, Dan Tran wrote: > >

Re: Expired message - does it work?

It turns out I am using topic and when my consumer is destroyed, all messages also destroyed, but the stats still lingering in the jconsole and this is were confusion starts. thanks -Dan Dan Tran wrote: > > > Hi Felix, > > Thanks for the info, both of my producer and consum

Re: Producer flow control not working when there is only one pair

) Any suggestion? Thanks -Dan Dan Tran wrote: > > > Hello, I am testing the producer flow control of activemq for both 5.2 > and 5.3-RC2. In my test bed, I have a number of producer an consumer > topic working in pair. When I have multiple pairs running at the same &

Producer flow control not working when there is only one pair

Hello, I am testing the producer flow control of activemq for both 5.2 and 5.3-RC2. In my test bed, I have a number of producer an consumer topic working in pair. When I have multiple pairs running at the same time where the producers are out pacing the consumers, the flow control feature wor

Re: Expired message - does it work?

number of > messages have not (yet) been acknowledged by the consumer. > Can it be that the consumer received the message but couldn't ack the 13 > messages since you stopped it ? > > > Cheers, > Felix > > > > > Dan Tran wrote: >> &g

Re: undesirable activemq-data directory

Ah you are right, it does not happen on 5.3-SNAPSHOT must be the left over of 5.2 Thanks for looking into this -D rajdavies wrote: > > > On 28 Sep 2009, at 05:51, Dan Tran wrote: > >> >> >> My ActiveMQ configuration does not persist message, all messages in

Expired message - does it work?

Hi, I am testing 5.3-SNAPSHOT to pick up expired message enhancement where the message will be automatically removed when timed out. I have multiple topics with each has a pair of producer/consumer. All messages are memory base, where 'memoryUsage' is used to do the producer flow control. All

undesirable activemq-data directory

My ActiveMQ configuration does not persist message, all messages in in memory. However activemq-data directory is created uppon startup. is this a bug? i tested with both 5.2. and 5.3-SNAPSHOT. Here is my configuration ...

Re: WARN [org.apache.activemq.usage.Usage] - . Is it nessessary?

will fixed at activemq side? -D rajdavies wrote: > > ooh - ok - I think we need to adjust something ;) > On 22 Jul 2009, at 16:54, Dan Tran wrote: > >> >> >> >> is it better if it is at DEBUG level? Or it really mean we must to >> adjust >>

WARN [org.apache.activemq.usage.Usage] - . Is it nessessary?

is it better if it is at DEBUG level? Or it really mean we must to adjust the memory accordingly. otherwise the log file will be full of these messages. This is new in 5.3 SNAPSHOT -D -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WARN--org.apache.activemq.usage.Usage%3CMemory-us

broken 5.3-SNAPSHOT when using localhost for transport

Hello works for 5.2.0 but break in 5.3-SNAPSHOT I have to change it to is this the expected behavior? Thanks -Dan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/broken-5.3-SNAPSHOT-when-using-localhost-for-transport-tp24599700p24599700.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User m

Re: send hangs using vm://

Any one with an answer for this question? from reading activemq doc and forum, the lockup is understandable, how it what it does not make sense is that it is still locked up when there only one client left. Thanks -dan Dan Tran wrote: > > > Hello, I have an embedded AMQ with

Re: Weird log message from stdout

Oops, sorry. It is 5.2 with 2 clients: sss and vm. The vm topic client is the receiving end -Dan rajdavies wrote: > > some details on version/config may help ;) > > On 19 Jul 2009, at 17:01, Dan Tran wrote: > >> >> >> Hello, >> >>

Weird log message from stdout

Hello, I am seeing the following message on stdout Conn: 172.30.63.41.42867.090709212649 SYSSH200 qasj04 for each StreamMessage received and 172.30.63.41 is another host that has nothign to do with my testbed. Any suggestion on this? Bug thanks ahead -Dan -- View this message in c

Is it possible to have multiple queue receivers listening on the same queue, using message selectors (typically filtering on a correlation ID) to determine which listener actually receives the message

Hi does ActiveMQ supports this feature? Thanks -D -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-multiple-queue-receivers-listening-on-the-same-queue%2C-using-message-selectors-%28typically-filtering-on-a-correlation-ID%29-to-determine-which-listener-actually-r

Re: a question about TTL(time to live) ...?

the fix will be in 5.3 perhaps? -D rajdavies wrote: > > Unfortunately not in the current release - though using a Queue > browser will have the same result - in forcing expired messages to be > removed > > On 15 May 2009, at 08:55, angel7 wrote: > >> >> thank you for your kind >> >> So,

send hangs using vm://

Hello, I have an embedded AMQ with 2 clients using vm:// and tcp:// respectively. The tcp://client mostly used to send lots of messages to the vm:// client. The vm://client periodically sends control massages to tcp:// client. The issue I am facing right now is the send operation from vm:// cl