will fixed at activemq side?
-D rajdavies wrote: > > ooh - ok - I think we need to adjust something ;) > On 22 Jul 2009, at 16:54, Dan Tran wrote: > >> >> >> >> is it better if it is at DEBUG level? Or it really mean we must to >> adjust >> the memory accordingly. otherwise the log file will be full of these >> messages. >> >> This is new in 5.3 SNAPSHOT >> >> -D >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/WARN--org.apache.activemq.usage.Usage----%3CMemory-usage-is-now-at-100-%3E.--Is-it-nessessary--tp24609194p24609194.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > Rob Davies > I work here: http://fusesource.com > My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WARN--org.apache.activemq.usage.Usage----%3CMemory-usage-is-now-at-100-%3E.--Is-it-nessessary--tp24609194p24609939.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
