the fix will be in 5.3 perhaps?
-D rajdavies wrote: > > Unfortunately not in the current release - though using a Queue > browser will have the same result - in forcing expired messages to be > removed > > On 15 May 2009, at 08:55, angel7 wrote: > >> >> thank you for your kind >> >> So, >> Isn't there how to remove automatically the message in queue after >> ttl , >> until a consumer register ? >> >> >> >> Andreas Gies wrote: >>> >>> HI there, >>> >>> are you looking at JConsole to determine this ? --- I think you are >>> running into >>> a particular behavior with ActiveMQ. The Time To Live is not >>> regularly >>> checked >>> (there is no cleanup thread for ttled messages). To be more concrete >>> the TTL is checked >>> checked when the message is dispatched to the consumer or when the >>> message >>> is paged into memory from the secondary storage. >>> If you simply send one message without having consumers, the message >>> will not >>> vanish from the broker. If you start up a consumer, you will notice >>> the message disappearing >>> without reaching the consumer. >>> >>> I hope that helps >>> Andreas >>> >>> On May 15, 2009, at 3:33 AM, angel7 wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I sended to queue a message after message setting TTL(time to live : >>>> 30 >>>> second) >>>> >>>> then i waited for 2 minute , >>>> >>>> but the message didn't expire. >>>> >>>> why ? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/a-question-about-TTL%28time-to-live%29-...--tp23551953p23551953.html >>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/a-question-about-TTL%28time-to-live%29-...--tp23551953p23555120.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/a-question-about-TTL%28time-to-live%29-...--tp23551953p24308415.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
