Hi. I would like to know how to seperate client from server in the activemq
jar.
Which jar files needs a client of the broker? Does it need the entire jar
file of the activemq,
or can it use seperate jar files?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Seperate-client-from-activemq-
Hatta,
Thanks, I will try it with 5.1.
Jackey
2008/4/28 Hatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Jackey,
>
> I had the same problem too. Until someone from the ActiveMQ Team responded
> to try out the new 5.1
>
> Guess what? I m not getting those funny messages anymore.
>
> Refer by searching this tex
I have a java Test Client that is using the javax.jms.TopicRequestor to send
a request on a topic. Below is a snippet of code of how the topicRequestor
call is made.
javax.jms.TopicRequestor requestor = new javax.jms.TopicRequestor(aSession,
aJmsTopic);
javax.jms.Message response = reques
Hi,
I am using Active MQ 5.0. The producer is in Java and the messages are of
type ObjectMessage. The consumer could wither be Java or C#. For c# clients
I am using NMS.
Is there a way of passing Java object to C# other than XML? If so could you
please point me some documentation as I could not
Is there a way to make ActiveMQ persist the transaction state into the DB so
the slave can pick up where the master left off with regards to transactions
started by not yet committed/rolledback/closed?
Rob Bugh wrote:
>
> What happends to uncommitted transactions during master/slave failover?
Come meet with the folks behind Apache ActiveMQ, Camel, CXF and
ServiceMix at JavaOne!
Please join us for an evening of food, drinks, conversation and open
source antics at the Zebulon Cafe in San Francisco on Monday, May 5,
2008 from 6-9PM. Some of the Apache committers behind these dynamic
proje
Hey folks,
i found the cause for this error, but so far no solution.
I looked at the output from netstat again:
netstat -tulpen | grep 6161
tcp0 0 :::61616:::*LISTEN
1011 70984032 1510/java
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:61
What happends to uncommitted transactions during master/slave failover?
I've configured two brokers as a JDBC Master and Slave. My client app
retrieves a message from a queue on the master, processes the message then
commits the transaction to permanently remove it from the queue.
The problem I'
I have been trying to figure out a way to add users and permissions to a
running broker without having to restart.
I thought I would be able to install plugins without restarting the broker.
Note that ActiveMQDestinationImpl is an a simple implementation of the
ActiveMQDestination.
I am gettin
Hi Joe,
i don't think that this is a firewall issue.
Before i start the two brokers
netstat -tulpen | grep 6161
shows nothing.
After starting activemq netstat shows:
netstat -tulpen | grep 6161
tcp0 0 :::61616:::*LISTEN
1011 709840
Hello.
I'm using a browser for getting messages stored in a queue without removing
them. The queue is filled with more than 12000 elements and I want to access
to single messages one by one. The main part of the method I use for getting
messages looks like this one:
if((queueContent= browser.get
I have two 5.1 brokers connecting okay over http transports. Could it be a
firewall-related issue?
Joe
Goto www.ttmsolutions.com for a free ActiveMQ user guide
j0llyr0g3r wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> i am having a hard time figuring out how to get http-tunneling working.
>
> According to the
Hey folks,
i am having a hard time figuring out how to get http-tunneling working.
According to the documentation from here:
http://activemq.apache.org/http-and-https-transports-reference.html
this should be quite easy.
Ok, so i set up broker "1" nice and easy (one inbound connector for
jms-c
It appears that when starting up, messages are not duplicated.
The full configurations are here: http://paste.uni.cc/18607
cheers
paul sorenson wrote:
I have been searching through the archives and found quite a few posts
re duplicate messages. None I have seen seem to fit the situation we
h
Hi dfrodrig,
Sorry, but i can't help you.
I hope someone from ActiveMQ team can answer...
dfrodrig wrote:
>
> Hi Deen,
>
> I am not using Jms transactions in most of the messages sent, and still
> the failover takes a huge amount of time.
>
> The problem is still around, any ideas to solve
Hi Jackey,
I had the same problem too. Until someone from the ActiveMQ Team responded
to try out the new 5.1
Guess what? I m not getting those funny messages anymore.
Refer by searching this text:
ActiveMQConnection:1653 - Async exception with no exception listener:
java.net.SocketException:
Hi Deen,
I am not using Jms transactions in most of the messages sent, and still the
failover takes a huge amount of time.
The problem is still around, any ideas to solve it? Should I raise a bug, or
is this an ActiveMQ feature? :-))
deen0 wrote:
>
> When i stopped using jms transactions,
17 matches
Mail list logo