Hi dfrodrig, Sorry, but i can't help you.
I hope someone from ActiveMQ team can answer... dfrodrig wrote: > > Hi Deen, > > I am not using Jms transactions in most of the messages sent, and still > the failover takes a huge amount of time. > > The problem is still around, any ideas to solve it? Should I raise a bug, > or is this an ActiveMQ feature? :-)) > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-From-Redo-Log-Only--tp15869535s2354p16936422.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
