Hi Deen, I am not using Jms transactions in most of the messages sent, and still the failover takes a huge amount of time.
The problem is still around, any ideas to solve it? Should I raise a bug, or is this an ActiveMQ feature? :-)) deen0 wrote: > > When i stopped using jms transactions, and started using client > acknowledgements, all these problems went away, and AMQ 5.1-snapshot is > now very stable and working just as expected. > > So my personal recommendation - do not use transactions. Use client > acknoledgements instead (acknowledge instead of commit, revert instead of > rollback). > > Best regards. > :-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-From-Redo-Log-Only--tp15869535s2354p16931584.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
