[uml-user] Setting up an virtual wireless network

2006-01-27 Thread jaideep dhok
Hello everyone,We have to create a virtual wireless network in a lab. Can this be done using uml?( Is there any better option?)  I guess we will need uml drivers for wireless cards.  Are they available for uml? Also, we have to emulate a large number of nodes, say 50-100 and we actually have only 3

Re: [uml-user] Setting up an virtual wireless network

2006-01-27 Thread Jelle Boomstra
On Friday 27 January 2006 09:21, jaideep dhok wrote: > Hello everyone, > We have to create a virtual wireless network in a lab. Can this be done > using uml?( Is there any better option?) I guess we will need uml drivers > for wireless cards. Are they available for uml? How deep does the simula

Re: [uml-user] Setting up an virtual wireless network

2006-01-27 Thread vincent guffens
jaideep dhok wrote: Hello everyone, We have to create a virtual wireless network in a lab. Can this be done using uml?( Is there any better option?) I guess we will need uml drivers for wireless cards. Are they available for uml? Also, we have to emulate a large number of nodes, say 50-100

Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...

2006-01-27 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 January 2006 01:25, saltytexan wrote: > Yes, that is what I suspected as well... > I believe the problem is that the kernel does not think IGMP is available. > The error message occurs when the code tries to setsockopt on a socket > declared to be an IGMP datagram socket. However, I

Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...

2006-01-27 Thread frank evans
I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE and that set it up correctly... Much thanks to all... Now I have another question: I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs, make, etc.  If I make linux on one host, running Fedora Core 3, with a gcc3.4.2 e

Re: [uml-user] 2.4 UML w/ gcc4 [was: Static Multicast Routing on UML...]

2006-01-27 Thread D. Bahi
frank evans wrote: > I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs, > make, etc. If I make linux on one host, running Fedora Core 3, with a > gcc3.4.2 everything works fine. If I make linux on a different host, > running Fedora Core 4, with a gcc 4.0.0, I get a bunch of com

[uml-user] hey user-mode-linux-user

2006-01-27 Thread Segura Phillip
--- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falka

[uml-user] hey user-mode-linux-user

2006-01-27 Thread Hardy Jarred
--- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falka

Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...

2006-01-27 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 27 January 2006 19:52, frank evans wrote: > I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE and that set > it up correctly... > > Much thanks to all... > Now I have another question: > I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs, make, > etc. If I

Re: [uml-user] 2.4 UML w/ gcc4 [was: Static Multicast Routing on UML...]

2006-01-27 Thread saltytexan
Thanks DB, I'll give that a try... Ben Evans  On 1/27/06, D. Bahi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: frank evans wrote:> I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs,> make, etc.  If I make linux on one host, running Fedora Core 3, with a > gcc3.4.2 everything works fine.  If I make

Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...

2006-01-27 Thread frank evans
Yes, and another UML'er has pointed me to patches he used successfully to compile with gcc4.  I'm going to give them a try...     On 1/27/06, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 27 January 2006 19:52, frank evans wrote:> I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE a

Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...

2006-01-27 Thread frank evans
Hi UML'ers, Well, you have all been helpful with my previous problems, so now I have another question: 1)  I want to set up a UML with 3 ethernet ports - eth0, eth1, and eth2 - each being connected to a separate virtual network.  From reading about the daemon, it seems I can get this done.  I do

Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...

2006-01-27 Thread frank evans
Hi UML'ers, OK, NEVERMIND!  It all works fine...I just can't type... Best Regards, Ben EvansOn 1/27/06, frank evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi UML'ers, Well, you have all been helpful with my previous problems, so now I have another question: 1)  I want to set up a UML with 3 ethernet ports