On Tuesday 04 October 2005 18:41, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Quoting Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > And I think that distributing usable root_fs images would be of great
> > help...
> > (actually, there are other sources but the site has no link to them -
> > plus I don't like that much cherry-
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 14:38, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > > Hmm, what's that? Faster than skas3 I guess?!
> > > Is this going to work on x86/amd64 guests on amd64 hosts too?
> Thing is, there are no reasons to trust me more than others...
> I'll put sha/md5 sums but I could still have trojaned i
Quoting Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
And I think that distributing usable root_fs images would be of great help...
(actually, there are other sources but the site has no link to them - plus I
don't like that much cherry-picking root_fs's from people I don't trust and
putting UML's approval
> > Hmm, what's that? Faster than skas3 I guess?!
> > Is this going to work on x86/amd64 guests on amd64 hosts too?
> No, SKAS4 would be as fast as SKAS3, but could be merged in mainline...
Nice, no more patching!
> And amd64 hosts would be fixed as well.
>
> Also, I've heard some reports of peop
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 13:53, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > The only problem is that, while there was some gross code in 2.6.4 patch,
> > nobody has bothered yet to port it over. And the compatibility layer is
> > very boring (which also means, difficult to get right, because you need
> > to make t
> The only problem is that, while there was some gross code in 2.6.4 patch,
> nobody has bothered yet to port it over. And the compatibility layer is very
> boring (which also means, difficult to get right, because you need to make
> the developers more careful than they'd be inclined to).
Tell
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 13:14, Antoine Martin wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 12:47 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Monday 03 October 2005 23:28, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > > > On Monday 03 October 2005 14:39, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Chris Lightfoot w
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 12:47 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Monday 03 October 2005 23:28, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > > On Monday 03 October 2005 14:39, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
>
> > I can run Java on x86 but not on amd64 guests, have
On Monday 03 October 2005 23:28, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > On Monday 03 October 2005 14:39, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> I can run Java on x86 but not on amd64 guests, have you got a fix for
> this somewhere?
First report... the fix was
>
> On Monday 03 October 2005 14:39, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:28:04AM +0100, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> > > At the cost that lots of programs in the guest simply
> > > won't work (strace, make, java, ime). Or has there been
> > > work fixing this?
> >
> > What are you talking
10 matches
Mail list logo
