Re: [uml-user] RFC: UML Kernel RPMs

2005-12-23 Thread Bill Rugolsky Jr.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 04:34:15PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > IMHO you need to have two RPMs: > a) one to install on the guest - it should normally provide modules only. > Btw, > you'd like to have modules also in .tgz format (for installation on non-RPM > guest distros). It can be installed o

Re: [uml-user] RFC: UML Kernel RPMs

2005-12-23 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 22:24, Michael Stowe wrote: > All: > I'm a recent convert to UML for VDS/PS hosting and have talked with Jeff > about providing RPMs of UML kernels. > I'd like to ask for input on a standardized location for the kernel and > modules to be installed to as well as any pa

Re: [uml-user] RFC: UML Kernel RPMs

2005-12-20 Thread Jim Carter
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Michael Stowe wrote: > I'm a recent convert to UML for VDS/PS hosting and have talked with Jeff > about providing RPMs of UML kernels. > I'd like to ask for input on a standardized location for the kernel and > modules to be installed to as well as any patches you would lik

Re: [uml-user] RFC: UML Kernel RPMs

2005-12-20 Thread Jelle Boomstra
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 22:24, Michael Stowe wrote: > All: > > I'm a recent convert to UML for VDS/PS hosting and have talked with Jeff > about providing RPMs of UML kernels. > > I'd like to ask for input on a standardized location for the kernel and > modules to be installed to as well as any

[uml-user] RFC: UML Kernel RPMs

2005-12-20 Thread Michael Stowe
All:   I'm a recent convert to UML for VDS/PS hosting and have talked with Jeff about providing RPMs of UML kernels.   I'd like to ask for input on a standardized location for the kernel and modules to be installed to as well as any patches you would like to see included in releases. I plan o