--- Fermín Galán Márquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the bug report (ok, only the conclusions: the technical details are
> too much to me at this moment :), I understand that (in that case) the
> problem is solved by the
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=186411 patch (kernel)
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:09:55PM +0200, Fermín Galán Márquez wrote:
> > the virtual machine boots right, but if I issue a simple 'iptables -L'
> > it hangs. Additionally, a top command in the host enviroment shows the
> > linux process associated to
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you give someone a dead easy entry point like this it encourages
> adoption.
>
> I think this can be done by embedding the filesystem as an initramfs
> in the UML kernel image. Then, running it might be a matter of
> wget the-image.bz2
>
--- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >> But it would also be nice to have an indication one
> >> way or the other in a prominent place.
> >
> > Well, stating clearly such a thing is a very good idea - can you do it,
> > Antoine?
> >
> Getting a few people to r
--- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with 2.4 (udev/devfs/etc)
> but apart from that any recent 2.6 kernel should do (bearing in mind
> that few bugfixes are backported (except for 2.6.16).
I was thinking more in terms of features added
Which uml guest kernels should be used with which filesystem images (does it
matter)?
I'm asking because I assume that more recent distros will make use of kernel
features which are not present in older kernels.
The nagafix page seems to promote a mix-and-match approach which doesn't sound
like i
--- Christopher Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The simplest way to do that (have a host act like a router between guests)
> would be to use ethertap devices. Each guest would talk to to the host
> through a different tap device and the guests would each use eth0 on their
> side.
What a
--- Flavio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to communicate you my new website: http://www.vdd-project.org .
> It contains my degree thesis work and the project involves two
> existing technologies: UML and LTSP.
Interesting ideas with good potential for showcasing Linux. However it strik
--- Haywood Floyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On host i write: xhost +192.169.0.250 ,the uml ip.
> On uml: i write export DISPLAY=192.169.0.250:0.0 , the host tap1 ip.
> On uml i installed firefox, xterm, icewm and xdmcp.
>
> On host tcp 6000 x11 port is open. so is udp 177 xdmcp port.
>
> Ever
--- Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To work on:
>
> /etc/fstab
> /etc/inittab maybe
Yup x 2.
> Device configs:
> things like hwclock, consolefonts and X11 don't make sense in UML (however
> you
> can run Xnest instead of normal X by changing a symlink somewhere). In some
> distros (
--- Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 August 2006 12:41, Richard Andrews wrote:
> > --- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What was the boot output?
> >
> > Verbatim terminal output
> >
> > $ ./kernel32-2.6.17.7 m
I'm looking for advice on building up a filesystem image file.
I have a working server that I want to mimick in UML. What is the best way to
get the filesystem of the real server into a UML filesystem image? What are the
gotchas? eg. I can immediately suspect device configs and partition tables
w
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:45:33PM +0200, Jax wrote:
> > > $ ARCH=um make linux
> > >
> > make linux ARCH=um
>
> These should be the same. In one case, it's in the environment and in the
> other, it's on the command line, but it's all the same to th
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What was the boot output?
Verbatim terminal output
$ ./kernel32-2.6.17.7 mem=64M
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking
Total Noob.
This is my first attempt at getting into UML. Not good so far.
I downloaded 2.6.17 32-bit x86 kernel from nagafix (http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/)
and it bombs on startup.
Host is FC4 at 2.6.17 (32bit x86) SMP on hyperthreaded P4.
Running in strace I see the following. The important bit se
15 matches
Mail list logo
