y it's not seeing skas3, I don't know. /proc/mm
should exist, for one thing. If that's not there, something went
wrong with your build.
is this in the 2.6.16-rc1 patch? or does it still require an external
patch.
David Lang
---
/~blaisorblade/binaries/2.6.16-bb1/)
I see guest patches at
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.16-bb1/
is there a similar set of patches for the host? or is this for both?
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 01:42, David Lang wrote:
yOn Mon, 27 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
I foolishly attempted to startup 25 uml instances on one system (dual 252
opterons with 8G of ram, each um instance getting 256M)
what I found was that they
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 00:09, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/skas3-2.6/
sorry, the host is a dual Opteron 252 with 8G of ram running 2.6.16
(which I understood
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 23:33, David Lang wrote:
I'm getting two types of errors show up once in a while
1. occasionally on startup the UML instances report 'unable to open an
Initial console', this is happeing ~10% of the time, but
t's mmapped from a
file in $TMPDIR (normally /tmp).
Ok, I'll define $TMPDIR to be /dev/shm (which debian mounts a tmpfs on)
and try this again
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting lang
ror -11'
I get this error after the uml instance if fully booted and running, but
after this error uml_mconsole cannot connect to them.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that exte
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 01:58, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
David Lang wrote:
> I upped the pid_max value to 128000 to give me some headroom there (each
> of the first 18 uml instances will end up running ~3600 processes when
> they finis
after things stabilize the results look basicly the same (the exact
numbers vary slightly, but the top symbols remain the same
should I forward this to linux-kernel as well?
David Lang
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
rebooting my system with idle=poll and profile=2 I get the following
schedule 0.1203
I'll do another run after things finish stabalizing.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and m
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Jeff Dike wrote:
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:27:39 -0500
From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-user] what are the current limits on how many uml's on one
h
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
David Lang wrote:
what could I do to assist in tracking down what is causing the contention?
Are you running a skas3-patched host kernel? You didn't mention if you were
running in 32bit mode. I don't believe there's a skas
yOn Mon, 27 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
I foolishly attempted to startup 25 uml instances on one system (dual 252
opterons with 8G of ram, each um instance getting 256M)
what I found was that they seem to be getting in each others way a LOT (just
on system boot), vmstat on the host is
g 2.6.16 without these problems.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking
es until I get in on
monday, so I'll give more details then unless I'm told that I am being
silly to try to start this many on one system.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that
atch it)
thanks for helping me out with this, and sorry for the flood of questions.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Saturday 25 March 2006 00:45, David Lang wrote:
to test my compile environment I copies the config from your kernel to my
dev box, did a make ARCH=um oldconfig (accepting all the defaults) and
tested the results.
You did that in the 32-bit chroot
x27;m replying to, full
config attached)
I don't see any obvious uml related differences (other then the fact that
I disabled TT mode to enable static linking per your prior suggestion),
any suggestions?
David Lang
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, David Lang w
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 04:34, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:09, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang uttered the following:
Debian there is trying to be smart anyway and helping the
skas0,
skas3 or TT.
Is this something uml can support?
I don't know about other non-standard memory configs, but there is an
explicit config option when compiling a uml kernel to support the 2G/2G
memory split.
David Lang
---
This S
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
Btw, you can also download pre-built UML binaries from my homepage (see
signature), and this is useful even to determine what's going on (e.g. say
that binary work, your one doesn't, let's compare con
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
Btw, you can also download pre-built UML binaries from my homepage (see
signature), and this is useful even to determine what's going on (e.g. say
that binary work, your one doesn't, let's compare configurations! Or a
couple
of months ago
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:55, David Lang wrote:
is there a way to build a i386 uml kernal on amd64?
I have a 64 bit debian build on my main box, but I need to run a uml
instance useing a 32 bit debian system image. I've attempted to use the
prior to that terms like 'no IP stack running on the host' were being
thrown around.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. A
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:09, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang uttered the following:
when you do ifup debian immediatly attempts to startup sendmail
(apparently by doing make as you see here). if you can't do name
resolution until
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
compiling a uml kernel on a i386 and trying to run in resulted in 'file not
found' (shared libraries not there for the 32 bit software on the 64 bit
system). so I did a chroot into a directory with a 32 bit system image in it
and attempted
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
is there a way to build a i386 uml kernal on amd64?
I have a 64 bit debian build on my main box, but I need to run a uml instance
useing a 32 bit debian system image. I've attempted to use the same uml
kernel that I have been useing for my ea
oops complaining about a missing init.
I'm currently trying to see if recompiling my host kernel to support ia32
binaries makes a difference, but I suspect that it won't (it may allow me
to compile a uml kernel on a 32 bit machine and use it for this, that will
be my next tes
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whispered secretively:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 17:46, David Lang wrote:
Configuring network interfaces...make: /etc/mail/Makefile: No such file or
directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/etc/mail/Makefile'.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:46:57AM -0800, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
hostfs as root is not well supported.
good to know, I'll avoid useing it for now. is it on the roadmap to be
supported?
No, it can't work as
for the host of these uml's to be as minimal as
possible to reduce any vunerabilities that are introduces by connecting
this host across different security environments.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 18:58, David Lang wrote:
Ok, not that I have interfaces showing up inside uml (2.6.15.6 didn't
work, but 2.6.16 does) I have another question.
is it possible to dedicate physical network interfaces to particula
weaken the seperation of the different
networks.
David Lang
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime deve
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 17:46, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
Ok, this is not hostfs-related likely.
Checking root file system...
fsck 1.37 (21-Mar-2005)
fsck.ext2: No such device or address while trying to open /dev
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Anthony Brock wrote:
Quoting David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I also get several thousand lines of error message like the following
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl
KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
Couldnt get a file descriptor referring to the console
These errors can
tl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDGKBTYPE called
Couldnt get a file descriptor referring to the console
Thanks for the assistance
37 matches
Mail list logo
