Re: [uml-user] QM_MODULES: Function not implemented

2005-06-17 Thread Dinesh Ahuja
As per your suggestions, I have created a new filesystem and mounted it on /mnt/cdrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# mount -t ext2 -o loop /home/dahuja/DownLoads/UMLPatches/disk2.img /mnt/cdrom The free available space is as follows : [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# df -h /mnt/cdrom FilesystemSiz

Re: [uml-user] User-Mode-Linux on 2.6.10

2005-06-17 Thread Jelle Boomstra
On Friday 17 June 2005 21:40, Riccardo Bianconi wrote: > I'm using Ubuntu Hoary with kernel 2.6.10-5-i386 > > This is what I do for install: > - download from ubuntu's repository the package "linux-source-2.6.10" You still have to patch this kernel with the newest skas. 2.6.10 was not a very good

[uml-user] User-Mode-Linux on 2.6.10

2005-06-17 Thread Riccardo Bianconi
I'm using Ubuntu Hoary with kernel 2.6.10-5-i386 This is what I do for install: - download from ubuntu's repository the package "linux-source-2.6.10" - I insert tar.bz2 souce file in a new directory called /usr/src/uml - Untar with "tar -xvjf" - enter in the dir with the source and digit make mrp

Re: [uml-user] 2048M memory set = file size exceeded

2005-06-17 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 17 June 2005 00:32, Frank Sorenson wrote: > Dan Lund wrote: > > So essentially it's a system limitation that has to be coded around? > > Anything under 2048 will work it seems. > > Correct. I'm guessing that nobody has really tried to give it that much > memory before. > > Coding around

Re: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS

2005-06-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:53:32PM +0100, Gordon Russell wrote: > Any thoughts? I am a little bit of a kernel hacker from the good old days, but > I have not done anything on 2.6 myself. > > If someone is already working on this could you let me know. Maybe I can help > to > push this forward. I

RE: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS

2005-06-17 Thread Barry, Christopher
> -Original Message- > From: Gordon Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 12:00 PM > To: Barry, Christopher > Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS > > > > Is anyone still involved with sbuml? > > > SBUML

Re: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS

2005-06-17 Thread Gordon Russell
> > Is anyone still involved with sbuml? > > SBUML is one technique for saving and restoring running UML processes. > Can you describe for me the case where this is a useful feature? > For me I am researching virtual processor farms as a replacement for fixed beuwolf clusters, where nodes can mig

RE: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS

2005-06-17 Thread Barry, Christopher
> -Original Message- > From: Gordon Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 8:54 AM > To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS > > Is anyone still involved with sbuml? > SBUML is one technique for saving and restor

[uml-user] SBUML status with SKAS

2005-06-17 Thread Gordon Russell
Is anyone still involved with sbuml? SBUML is one technique for saving and restoring running UML processes. I would love to get this working with the current 2.6 SKAS kernels. I am thinking about picking this code up to see if it can be fixed, or using one of the other core dump techniques out the