RE: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Stuart
Wow... thanks for the great discussion- it helped. Cheers, Stuart -Original Message- From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:50 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: UML and Struts yes, it mixes some structual as

RE: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Stuart
Wow... thanks for the great discussion- it helped. Cheers, Stuart -Original Message- From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:50 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: UML and Struts yes, it mixes some structual as

RE: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
se. > > BR > /Amleto > > P.S.: sorry for my not so good english. > > > -Messaggio originale- > > Da: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Inviato: martedì 18 gennaio 2005 19.15 > > A: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; [E

RE: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, > To me, that makes a sequence diagram not the most useful way > to "draw" a Struts app's architecture. I think a flowchart > showing the flow from each page to the action that it submits > to, with outbound arrows to the pages that get rendered, > conveys more about the overall structure

Re: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:48:08 +, Mark Benussi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well Jim I know you are a well respected man on this group but I would say > in defence that the JSP is not invoking it is the url of the html in a users > browser. The only place I could see a jsp living would be on the

Re: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Mark Benussi
Well Jim I know you are a well respected man on this group but I would say in defence that the JSP is not invoking it is the url of the html in a users browser. The only place I could see a jsp living would be on the return call.

Re: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Jim Barrows
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:31:28 +, Mark Benussi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would say that the action would be the first class that the User actor > would invoke the execute method with. The next class would I suppose be the The JSP page is also a class, and needs to modeled. > method of a ma

RE: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Mark Benussi
I would say that the action would be the first class that the User actor would invoke the execute method with. The next class would I suppose be the method of a manager that you invoke from the action and then whatever classes such as DAO's you invoke following that. Original Message Follow

Re: UML and Struts

2005-01-18 Thread Jim Barrows
On a sequence diagram? Sequence diagrams usually portray the actual classes being used. Since most of the classes you'll be diagramming are inherited, the struts classes themselves probably won't show up. On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:45:31 -0800, Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am crea