yes, it mixes some structual aspects. The diagram is responsible to explain a flow with it's "components" (eg clazz, jsp, tiles...)
that's all :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Amleto Di Salle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 7:42 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: R: UML and Struts > > > Hi, > Maybe, in your diagram you are mixing structural aspects with > the behavioural ones. In fact you have numbered your > association, in order to explain what do you mean. In your > example, you can use one class diagram in order to explain > the "collaboration" between classes (without the actor and > the numbering and inserting the html page generated by jsp), > and use several sequences in order to explain the different > scenarios for your use-case. > > BR > /Amleto > > P.S.: sorry for my not so good english. > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > > Da: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Inviato: marted́ 18 gennaio 2005 19.15 > > A: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Oggetto: RE: UML and Struts > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > To me, that makes a sequence diagram not the most useful way to > > > "draw" a Struts app's architecture. I think a flowchart > showing the > > > flow from each page to the action that it submits to, > with outbound > > > arrows to the pages that get rendered, conveys more about the > > > overall structure. > > > > I have done similar: > > http://www.w3l.de/w3lmedia/W3L/Medium034880/gif_1.gif > > > > I am > > using *custom* stereo typs (like Conallen) > > -->Struts Action > > ->Tiles Page (composed pages with tiles, no forms) > > ->Tiles Form (if formBean *backed* to JSP...) > > > > eg... > > > > Sequence diagram could indeed not be very useful, > > since it't more technical... > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: > 16/01/2005 > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 16/01/2005 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
