On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:31:28 +0000, Mark Benussi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would say that the action would be the first class that the User actor > would invoke the execute method with. The next class would I suppose be the
The JSP page is also a class, and needs to modeled. > method of a manager that you invoke from the action and then whatever > classes such as DAO's you invoke following that. > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> > To: <user@struts.apache.org> > Subject: UML and Struts > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:45:31 -0800 > > Hi, > > I am creating some UML (sequence diagrams) for an application in which we > will use Struts. Does anyone have any suggestions on the best way to draw > the UML such that its clear that Struts (or at least MVC) is being used but > does not end being UML just about Struts? I guess what I am asking is what > key strut classes would you put on a UML sequence diagram to describe the > architecture of a web application when you do not want the focus to be > struts? > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > Regards, > > Stuart > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
