More information:
>From the master node, I cannot `telnet localhost 6123` nor `telnet 6123` while the cluster is apparently running. Connection refused
immediately. `netstat -n | grep 6123` is empty. There's no server
listening. But the processes are running on all machines.
Does it matter that
I'm running a standalone cluster on Amazon EC2. Leader election is
happening according to the logs, and the Flink Dashboard is up and running,
accessible remotely. The issue I'm having is that the SocketWordCount
example is not working, the local connection is being refused!
In the Flink Dashboard
Thanks for the pointer and sorry for the late answer.
I guess that depends on the semantics of "checkpointing". In Flink's
terminology this means creating a copy of the state (and writing the copy
to the external FS). It does not mean that the state is migrated or moved
to the external FS.
Best, F
No, this is not possible unless you use an external service such as a
database.
The assigners might run on different machines and Flink does not provide
utilities for r/w shared state.
Best, Fabian
2016-09-15 20:17 GMT+02:00 Saiph Kappa :
> And is it possible to share state across parallel insta
And is it possible to share state across parallel instances with
AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks?
Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> Hi,
> the problem might be that your timestamp/watermark assigner is run in
> parallel and that only one parallel instance of tho
Hello Vaidya,
The error message is talking about the class "AbstractTime", which was
removed long ago (before 1.0). Could you please double check that the
Flink version is set appropriately everywhere, and that the binaries
running in the cluster are really 1.1.2?
Best,
Gábor
2016-09-15 11:52
Hi Vinay,
There are some delays and we expect the PR to be created next week.
RegardsVijay
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 5:41 PM, vinay patil
wrote:
Hi Vijay,
Did you raise the PR for this task, I don't mind testing it out as well.
Regards,Vinay Patil
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:28 PM
Hello,
Is FlinkCEP applicable to large key spaces with potentially long timeouts
between events that define a pattern? Ideally, without ridiculous hardware.
More concretely, we segment users (one key per user) based on sequences of
events for that user.
A segment "Abandoned Cart" may be defined
Dear Marton,
Thanks very much for taking time to look into this issue. Actually I am on
latest Flink version (1.1.2). Would the Hadoop version might be causing the
problem (it is 2.6 with CDH 5.5.1)? Would appreciate any more pointers to
resolve this.
Thanks,
Vaidya.
> On 14-Sep-2016, at 4
Hi Radu,
thanks for continuing the discussion we had at the conference here. Your
proposals are all valid. If you have a look at the inital design
document [1] for Table API/SQL we plan to add a SQL client at some
point, but first we should focus on extending the set of supported
operations.
10 matches
Mail list logo