On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:26:06 +0100 Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
SL> Given how Cassandra works, I don't think that the server can do much
SL> better than the read, write, delete your client already do
SL> (basically everything is immutable, you only 'add' new versions). As
SL> this cannot be done effi
2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov :
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:50:53 -0500 Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> JE> 2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov :
>>> I find it useful in one particular schema to have SuperColumns with
>>> specific names and rename them sometimes. Rather than client-side
>>> (read, write, delete) it would be
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:50:53 -0500 Jonathan Ellis wrote:
JE> 2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov :
>> I find it useful in one particular schema to have SuperColumns with
>> specific names and rename them sometimes. Rather than client-side
>> (read, write, delete) it would be nice if there was a SuperColumnR
+1 for renaming the S Column/Column as a atomic operation :)
Regards,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> -1 on adding a special case for this.
>
> 2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov :
> > I find it useful in one particular schema to have SuperColumns with
> > specific names and ren
-1 on adding a special case for this.
2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov :
> I find it useful in one particular schema to have SuperColumns with
> specific names and rename them sometimes. Rather than client-side
> (read, write, delete) it would be nice if there was a SuperColumnRename
> Mutation than encaps
