-1 on adding a special case for this.
2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com>: > I find it useful in one particular schema to have SuperColumns with > specific names and rename them sometimes. Rather than client-side > (read, write, delete) it would be nice if there was a SuperColumnRename > Mutation than encapsulated that sequence on the server side and perhaps > implemented it more efficiently. Right now I pay a pretty high cost for > the client roundtrips and this would make my writers much more > efficient. I don't need it to be atomic. > > Is this feasible and has it been discussed before? > > Thanks > Ted > >
