+1 for renaming the S Column/Column as a atomic operation :) Regards, </VJ>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 on adding a special case for this. > > 2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com>: > > I find it useful in one particular schema to have SuperColumns with > > specific names and rename them sometimes. Rather than client-side > > (read, write, delete) it would be nice if there was a SuperColumnRename > > Mutation than encapsulated that sequence on the server side and perhaps > > implemented it more efficiently. Right now I pay a pretty high cost for > > the client roundtrips and this would make my writers much more > > efficient. I don't need it to be atomic. > > > > Is this feasible and has it been discussed before? > > > > Thanks > > Ted > > > > >
