28, 2018 10:11:19 AM
To: user
Subject: Re: Cassandra on high performance machine: virtualization vs Docker
Thanks
Unfortunately yes! this is a production, That's the only thing i have! and I'm
going to use ESX (I'm not worried about throughput overhead although stress
tests sho
Thanks
Unfortunately yes! this is a production, That's the only thing i have! and I'm
going to use ESX (I'm not worried about throughput overhead although stress
tests shows no problem with esx some thing like throughput of cassandra on
single physical server < 3 * nodes on the same server)
If
Same technique works for production, too. Rack aware snitch will protect
against placing replicas on the same host, as long as the rack info is correct
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 8:43 PM, daemeon reiydelle wrote:
>
> Docker will provide less per node overhead.
>
> And yes, virtua
Docker will provide less per node overhead.
And yes, virtualizing smaller nodes out of a bigger physical makes sense.
Of course you lose the per node failure protection, but I guess this is not
production?
<==>
"Who do you think made the first stone spear? The Asperger guy.
If you get rid of
What i've got to set up my Apache Cassandra cluster are some Servers with 20
Core cpu * 2 Threads and 128 GB ram and 8 * 2TB disk.
Just read all over the web: Do not use big nodes for your cluster, i'm
convinced to run multiple nodes on a single physical server.
So the question is which techno
