Same technique works for production, too. Rack aware snitch will protect against placing replicas on the same host, as long as the rack info is correct
-- Jeff Jirsa > On Feb 27, 2018, at 8:43 PM, daemeon reiydelle <daeme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Docker will provide less per node overhead. > > And yes, virtualizing smaller nodes out of a bigger physical makes sense. Of > course you lose the per node failure protection, but I guess this is not > production? > > > <======> > "Who do you think made the first stone spear? The Asperger guy. > If you get rid of the autism genetics, there would be no Silicon Valley" > Temple Grandin > Daemeon C.M. Reiydelle > San Francisco 1.415.501.0198 > London 44 020 8144 9872 > > >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:26 PM, onmstester onmstester <onmstes...@zoho.com> >> wrote: >> What i've got to set up my Apache Cassandra cluster are some Servers with 20 >> Core cpu * 2 Threads and 128 GB ram and 8 * 2TB disk. >> Just read all over the web: Do not use big nodes for your cluster, i'm >> convinced to run multiple nodes on a single physical server. >> So the question is which technology should i use: Docker or Virtualiztion >> (ESX)? Any exprience? >> >> Sent using Zoho Mail >> >> >> >
