Thanks for reporting! The missing table defined in the source file,
`doc/source/operating/metrics.rst`, is invalid, hence not rendered.
I just filed a ticket for it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16410
- Yifan
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 4:58 PM Carl Mueller
wrote:
>
> https://ca
https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/operating/metrics.html#table-metrics
I checked with Chrome and Firefox
Ok,
I submitted to datastax my question.
Regards,
Raphaël CHAUMIER
De : Vladimir Yudovin [mailto:vla...@winguzone.com]
Envoyé : mardi 22 novembre 2016 16:59
À : user
Objet : RE: cassandra documentation (Multiple datacenter write requests)
question
Is Apache Cassandra community can update
hkro...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 22 novembre 2016 14:48
À : user@cassandra.apache.org
Objet : Re: cassandra documentation (Multiple datacenter write requests)
question
Looks like the graph is wrong.
Hannu
On 22 Nov 2016, at 15.43, CHAUMIER, RAPHAËL <racha...@bouyguestelecom.f
Thank you Hannu,
Is Apache Cassandra community can update this documentation ?
De : Hannu Kröger [mailto:hkro...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 22 novembre 2016 14:48
À : user@cassandra.apache.org
Objet : Re: cassandra documentation (Multiple datacenter write requests)
question
Looks like the graph
Looks like the graph is wrong.
Hannu
> On 22 Nov 2016, at 15.43, CHAUMIER, RAPHAËL
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I don’t know if you have access to DataStax documentation. I don’t understand
> the example about Multiple datacenter write requests
> (http://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/
Hello everyone,
I don't know if you have access to DataStax documentation. I don't understand
the example about Multiple datacenter write requests
(http://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/3.0/cassandra/dml/dmlClientRequestsMultiDCWrites.html).
The graph shows there's 3 nodes making up of QUORUM,
Totally agree, I just saw DataStax + docs so I figured it was about DSE,
not OSS C* *shrug*.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Justin Cameron
wrote:
> Maybe a little off-tangent, but there is also a set of open source
> documentation now available on the Apache Cassandra website:
> http://cassandr
Hi Oleg,
I highly recommend to contribute to Apache documentation. I think C* needs
lot more non-datastax documentation.
Lahiru
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Justin Cameron
wrote:
> Maybe a little off-tangent, but there is also a set of open source
> documentation now available on the Apache
Maybe a little off-tangent, but there is also a set of open source
documentation now available on the Apache Cassandra website:
http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/
You can contribute to them directly via git
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 at 12:11 SmartCat - Scott Hirleman
wrote:
> http://docs.datastax
http://docs.datastax.com/en/landing_page/doc/landing_page/contact.html
Looks like it is still just email d...@datastax.com
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Oleg Krayushkin
wrote:
> Hi, from time to time I find errors in datastax cassandra docs. Is there a
> right & easy way to report them?
>
> Th
Hi, from time to time I find errors in datastax cassandra docs. Is there a
right & easy way to report them?
Thanks.
--
Oleg Krayushkin
Thanks. I’ll pass it along to the doc team.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Kevin Burton
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:34 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: here's a good example of poor cassandra documentation.
so searching google for "cassandra leveled compaction"
there
so searching google for "cassandra leveled compaction"
there are no hits for explaining 2.x leveled compaction.
The first hit is:
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/leveled-compaction-in-apache-cassandra
which is a blog post from 2011.
The second hit is documentation on 1.1 which has just 2 sent
s, but any knowledge content in them
>> definitely needs to be in the docs as well.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> *From:* Tyler Hobbs
>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:07 PM
>> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Why is the ca
07 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas Okunew
> wrote:
>
>> most of the important stuff being in blog format
>
>
> Which blog posts are you re
Subject: Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas Okunew wrote:
most of the important stuff being in blog format
Which blog posts are you referring to? We could definitely have the docs team
integrate some of the blog post topics into
A lot of the information about the compaction strategies would be
incredibly useful in the docs as well:
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/leveled-compaction-in-apache-cassandra
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Peter Lin wrote:
> for example, this old blog entry from way back in 2012
>
> http://
for example, this old blog entry from way back in 2012
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cql3-for-cassandra-experts
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Tyler Hobbs wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas Okunew
> wrote:
>
>> most of the important stuff being in blog format
>
>
> Whi
for starters all of the blog entries related to CQL3, like the change in
terminology and compact storage.
the last time I looked at the datastax documentation on CQL3, it wasn't
nearly as detailed as the blog entries by jonathan ellis and sylvain.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Tyler Hobbs w
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas Okunew wrote:
> most of the important stuff being in blog format
Which blog posts are you referring to? We could definitely have the docs
team integrate some of the blog post topics into the normal docs and keep
them updated for new C* versions.
--
ansky
>
> *From:* Nicholas Okunew
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2014 8:29 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
>
> I think the problem is a little deeper than that. I've been working with
> cassan
: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 8:29 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
I think the problem is a little deeper than that. I've been working with
cassandra for about 7 months now - it was very challenging to find out any real
information
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> I have a lot of experience in distribute systems, understand the space
> well, but I just can't find documentation on how cassandra does things from
> a high level perspective.
>
My belief as to the reason why you are unable to find design
This is a great post… and really does a great job of summarizing the
problems I have with the cassandra documentation.
I realize that Datastax is trying to step in and fix the problem.. but
there are now a lot of parties involved (JIRA tickets, blog posts, datastax
doc, apache doc, etc) … it&#
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Jason Wee wrote:
> I agree to the people here already sharing their ways to access
> documentation. If you are starter, you should better spend time to search
> for documentation (like using google) or hours to read. Then start ask
> specific question. Coming here
My experience is similar to Nicholas'. Basic usage was easy to get a handle
on, but the advanced tuning/tweaking info is scattered EVERYWHERE around
the web, mostly on personal blogs. It feels like it took way too long to
become confident enough in my understanding of Cassandra that I trust our
dep
I'll note that historically the wiki used to be open to all and due massive
amounts of spam it was put on lockdown by the ASF.
If there is a better platform the community feels would make it simpler to
provide community based documentation then we should consider it.
The ASF also has confluence wi
We had a massive spam problem before we locked down the wiki, so
unfortunately that was the choice we had to make. But as stated we can
add you to the contributers list.
What is your Wiki user name?
On 2014-07-23 07:33, Peter Lin wrote:
> I've tried to contribute docs to Cassandra wiki in
@benedict - you're right that I've haven't requested permission to edit.
You're also right that I've given up on getting edit permission to
cassandra wiki. I've been struggling and struggled with "how" to manage
open source projects, so I totally get it. Managing projects is a thankless
job most of
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Peter Lin wrote:
>
> I sent a request to add a link my .Net driver for cassandra to the wiki
> over 5 weeks back and no response at all.
>
TL;DR There is something wrong with Cassandra information sharing, but I am
partly to blame.
My experience has not been too
Requesting a change is very different to requesting permission to edit
(which, I note, still hasn't been made); we do our best to promote
community engagement, so granting a privilege request has a different
mental category to a random edit request, which is much more likely to be
forgotten by any
ser@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
>
>
> I sent a request to add a link my .Net driver for cassandra to the wiki
> over 5 weeks back and no response at all.
>
> I sent another request way back in 2013 and got zero respo
: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
I sent a request to add a link my .Net driver for cassandra to the wiki over 5
weeks back and no response at all.
I sent another request way back in 2013 and got zero response. Again, I totally
I sent a request to add a link my .Net driver for cassandra to the wiki
over 5 weeks back and no response at all.
I sent another request way back in 2013 and got zero response. Again, I
totally understand people are busy and I'm just as guilty as everyone else
of letting requests slip by. It's the
> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> *From:* spa...@gmail.com
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2014 4:25 AM
>> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
>>
>> I would like to help out with the documentation
All requests I've seen in the past year to edit the wiki (admittedly only
2-3) have been answered promptly with editing privileges. Personally I
don't have a major preference either way for policy - there are positives
and negatives to each approach - but, like I said, raise it on the dev list
and
e,
> so I can make sure they see corrections and improvements. And simply
> sharing knowledge on this list is always a big step forward.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> *From:* spa...@gmail.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2014 4:25 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
>
I've submitted requests to edit the wiki in the past and nothing ever got
done.
Having been an apache committer and contributor over the years, I can
totally understand that people are busy. I also understand that "most"
developer find writing docs tedious.
I'd rather not harass the committers ab
sharing knowledge on
this list is always a big step forward.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: spa...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 4:25 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality?
I would like to help out with the documentation of C*. How do
It only takes a moment to ask to be added as a wiki contributor; if you
email the dev list or ask on irc, somebody with privileges will ordinarily
add you within a day. It may be a psychological barrier, but it isn't
really a practical one. Still, if you feel the policy is incorrect, raise
this on
I've tried to contribute docs to Cassandra wiki in the past, but there's an
obstacle.
currently wiki.apache.org/cassandra is locked down, so only commiters can
edit it. I really wish that wasn't the case, since it wastes time. the
commiters are busy writing code. Having to email a commiter and ask
I would like to help out with the documentation of C*. How do I start?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Robert Stupp wrote:
> Just a note:
> If you have suggestions how to improve documentation on the datastax
> website, write them an email to d...@datastax.com. They appreciate
> proposals :)
Just a note:
If you have suggestions how to improve documentation on the datastax website,
write them an email to d...@datastax.com. They appreciate proposals :)
Am 23.07.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Mark Reddy :
> Hi Kevin,
>
> The difference here is that the Apache Cassandra site is maintained by th
Hi Kevin,
The difference here is that the Apache Cassandra site is maintained by the
community whereas the DataStax site is maintained by paid employees with a
vested interest in producing documentation.
With DataStax having some comprehensive docs, I guess the desire for people
to maintain the A
This document:
https://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations
… for example. Is extremely out dated… does NOT reflect 2.x releases
certainly. Mentions commands that are long since removed/deprecated.
Instead of giving bad documentation, maybe remove this and mark it as
obsolete.
The datastax do
For eg: apache commons object
mapper doesn't resolve.
Is that expected? Others have suggested using maven instead.
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Cassandra-documentation-tp6012810p6025975.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
Here is a blog my team is working on at Accenture which is intended to be a
complete beginner's guide to Cassandra. I'm still updating a few posts based
on DataStax's recommendations and I need to add the last three posts (will
get this done soon), but you can start checking it out via this link:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:06 +1300, Aaron Morton wrote:
> There is also a book http://oreilly.com/catalog/0636920010852
>
> I've not read it yet, so cannot comment on it's quality.
Good book, worth getting. Cassandra is a moving target so some detailed
info is already out of date, eg references to
I've read the book and overall I think its a great book. It should
especially useful for those getting started.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Aaron Morton wrote:
> There is also a book http://oreilly.com/catalog/0636920010852
>
> I've not read it yet, so cannot comment on it's quality.
>
> Aar
There is also a book http://oreilly.com/catalog/0636920010852
I've not read it yet, so cannot comment on it's quality.
Aaron
On 11/02/2011, at 7:22 AM, Peter Schuller wrote:
>> I am unable to find a single source where there is a complete documentation
>> of Cassandra. I find some blogs here a
> I am unable to find a single source where there is a complete documentation
> of Cassandra. I find some blogs here and there or a short descriptions on
> the wiki page.
>
> Where can I get a good documentation to start with understanding Cassandra
> and it's administration?
I believe the most co
ge in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Cassandra-documentation-tp6012810p6012810.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
or d...@riptano.com
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> We'll get those fixed.
>
> Here or tho...@riptano.com directly is fine.
>
> Thanks!
>
single point of failure." when the correct should be " Because all nodes are
>> symmetric and there are no "master" nodes, there is NO single point of
>> failure."
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>>>
>
s are symmetric and there are no "master" nodes, there is
> single point of failure." when the correct should be " Because all nodes are
> symmetric and there are no "master" nodes, there is NO single point of
> failure."
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11
ere are no "master" nodes, there is *NO *single point of
failure."
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Riptano has posted Cassandra documentation at
> http://www.riptano.com/docs/, starting with 0.6.5. We're working to
> add sections on Hadoop inte
Riptano has posted Cassandra documentation at
http://www.riptano.com/docs/, starting with 0.6.5. We're working to
add sections on Hadoop integration and on troubleshooting, as well as
a version for 0.7. Feedback is welcome!
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-found
58 matches
Mail list logo
