there's quite a few blog entries on Datastax blog that really should be included in the docs
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Hao Cheng <br...@critica.io> wrote: > I second this, especially since the version association for blog posts is > often vague. This makes looking at historical blog posts quite annoying > because it's difficult to tell if some of the specific advice has changed > since. > On Jul 24, 2014 2:23 PM, "Jack Krupansky" <j...@basetechnology.com> wrote: > >> Blog posts are great for highlighting and focusing the community on >> new features, changes, and techniques, but any knowledge content in them >> definitely needs to be in the docs as well. >> >> -- Jack Krupansky >> >> *From:* Tyler Hobbs <ty...@datastax.com> >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:07 PM >> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org >> *Subject:* Re: Why is the cassandra documentation such poor quality? >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicholas Okunew <naoku...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> most of the important stuff being in blog format >> >> >> Which blog posts are you referring to? We could definitely have the docs >> team integrate some of the blog post topics into the normal docs and keep >> them updated for new C* versions. >> >> >> -- >> Tyler Hobbs >> DataStax <http://datastax.com/> >> >
