I sent a request to add a link my .Net driver for cassandra to the wiki
over 5 weeks back and no response at all.

I sent another request way back in 2013 and got zero response. Again, I
totally understand people are busy and I'm just as guilty as everyone else
of letting requests slip by. It's the reality of contributing to open
source as a hobby. If I wasn't serious about contributing to cassandra
community, I wouldn't have spent 2.5 months porting Hector to C# manually.

Perhaps the real cause is that some committers can't "empathise" with
others in the community?


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith <
belliottsm...@datastax.com> wrote:

> All requests I've seen in the past year to edit the wiki (admittedly only
> 2-3) have been answered promptly with editing privileges. Personally I
> don't have a major preference either way for policy - there are positives
> and negatives to each approach - but, like I said, raise it on the dev list
> and see if anybody else does.
>
> However I must admit I cannot empathise with your characterisation of
> requesting permission as 'begging', or a 'slap in the face', or that it is
> even particularly onerous. It is a slight psychological barrier, but in my
> personal experience when a psychological barrier as low as this prevents me
> from taking action, it's usually because I don't have as much desire to
> contribute as I thought I did.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Peter Lin <wool...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I've submitted requests to edit the wiki in the past and nothing ever got
>> done.
>>
>> Having been an apache committer and contributor over the years, I can
>> totally understand that people are busy. I also understand that "most"
>> developer find writing docs tedious.
>>
>> I'd rather not harass the committers about wiki edits, since I didn't
>> like it when it happened to me in the past. That's why many apache projects
>> keep their wiki's open. Honestly, as much as I find writing docs
>> challenging and tedious, it's critical and important. For my other open
>> source projects, I force myself to write docs.
>>
>> my point is, the wiki should be open and the barrier should be removed.
>> Having to "beg/ask" to edit the wiki feels like a slap in the face to me,
>> but maybe I'm alone in this. Then again, I've heard the same sentiment from
>> other people about cassandra's wiki. The thing is, they just chalk it up to
>> "cassandra committers don't give a crap about docs". I do my best to defend
>> the committers and point out some are volunteers, but it does give the
>> public a negative impression. I know the committers care about docs, but
>> they don't always have time to do it.
>>
>> I know that given a choice between coding or writing docs, 90% of the
>> time I'll choose coding. What I've decided instead is to document stuff on
>> one of my blogs.  If someone gets lucky, maybe google will return the
>> result. I keep asking myself "what's the point of closing a wiki?"
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith <
>> belliottsm...@datastax.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It only takes a moment to ask to be added as a wiki contributor; if you
>>> email the dev list or ask on irc, somebody with privileges will ordinarily
>>> add you within a day. It may be a psychological barrier, but it isn't
>>> really a practical one. Still, if you feel the policy is incorrect, raise
>>> this on the dev list also.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Peter Lin <wool...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've tried to contribute docs to Cassandra wiki in the past, but
>>>> there's an obstacle.
>>>>
>>>> currently wiki.apache.org/cassandra is locked down, so only commiters
>>>> can edit it. I really wish that wasn't the case, since it wastes time. the
>>>> commiters are busy writing code. Having to email a commiter and ask them to
>>>> update it feels silly to me and kind of goes against openness. Back when I
>>>> was active with JMeter, we decided to leave it open so that anyone can edit
>>>> the docs.
>>>>
>>>> I can't be the only one that wants to help make the docs better, but
>>>> get frustrated with the wiki being closed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:25 AM, <spa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like to help out with the documentation of C*. How do I start?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just a note:
>>>>>> If you have suggestions how to improve documentation on the datastax
>>>>>> website, write them an email to d...@datastax.com. They appreciate
>>>>>> proposals :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.07.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Mark Reddy <mark.re...@boxever.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The difference here is that the Apache Cassandra site is maintained
>>>>>> by the community whereas the DataStax site is maintained by paid 
>>>>>> employees
>>>>>> with a vested interest in producing documentation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With DataStax having some comprehensive docs, I guess the desire for
>>>>>> people to maintain the Apache site has dwindled. However, if you are
>>>>>> interested in contributing to it and bringing it back up to standard you
>>>>>> can, thus is the freedom of open source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This document:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> … for example.  Is extremely out dated… does NOT reflect 2.x
>>>>>>> releases certainly.  Mentions commands that are long since
>>>>>>> removed/deprecated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Instead of giving bad documentation, maybe remove this and mark it
>>>>>>> as obsolete.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The datastax documentation… is … acceptable I guess.  My main
>>>>>>> criticism there is that a lot of it it is in their blog.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com <http://spinn3r.com/>
>>>>>>> Location: *San Francisco, CA*
>>>>>>> blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
>>>>>>> … or check out my Google+ profile
>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
>>>>>>> <http://spinn3r.com/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://spawgi.wordpress.com
>>>>> We can do it and do it better.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to